Literature DB >> 21775528

A low glycemic index diet does not affect postprandial energy metabolism but decreases postprandial insulinemia and increases fullness ratings in healthy women.

Inger Krog-Mikkelsen1, Birgitte Sloth, Dimiter Dimitrov, Inge Tetens, Inger Björck, Anne Flint, Jens J Holst, Arne Astrup, Helena Elmståhl, Anne Raben.   

Abstract

At present, it is difficult to determine whether glycemic index (GI) is an important tool in the prevention of lifestyle diseases, and long-term studies investigating GI with diets matched in macronutrient composition, fiber content, energy content, and energy density are still scarce. We investigated the effects of 2 high-carbohydrate (55%) diets with low GI (LGI; 79) or high GI (HGI; 103) on postprandial blood profile, subjective appetite sensations, energy expenditure (EE), substrate oxidation rates, and ad libitum energy intake (EI) from a corresponding test meal (LGI or HGI) after consuming the diets ad libitum for 10 wk. Two groups of a total of 29 healthy, overweight women (age: 30.5 ± 6.6 y; BMI: 27.6 ± 1.5 kg/m(2)) participated in the 10-wk intervention and a subsequent 4-h meal test. The breakfast test meals differed in GI but were equal in total energy, macronutrient composition, fiber content, and energy density. The LGI meal resulted in lower plasma glucose, serum insulin, and plasma glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and higher plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations than the HGI meal (P ≤ 0.05). Ratings of fullness were slightly higher and the desire to eat something fatty was lower after the test meal in the LGI group (P < 0.05). Postprandial plasma GLP-2, plasma glucagon, serum leptin, plasma ghrelin, EE, substrate oxidation rates, and ad libitum EI at lunch did not differ between groups. In conclusion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and subjective appetite ratings after a test meal were better after 10-wk ad libitum intake of a LGI compared to a HGI diet. EE and substrate oxidation rates were, however, not affected. These findings give some support to recommendations to consume a LGI diet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775528     DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.134627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  19 in total

1.  Low-glycemic load decreases postprandial insulin and glucose and increases postprandial ghrelin in white but not black women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Brownley; Steve Heymen; Alan L Hinderliter; Joseph Galanko; Beth Macintosh
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Postprandial lipid responses to standard carbohydrates used to determine glycaemic index values.

Authors:  Sonia Vega-López; Lynne M Ausman; Nirupa R Matthan; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  Effect of Two Oat-based Cereals on Subjective Ratings of Appetite.

Authors:  Candida J Rebello; William D Johnson; Corby Martin; Jodee Johnson; Marianne O'Shea; YiFang Chu; Frank L Greenway
Journal:  Curr Top Nutraceutical Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 0.416

4.  Evaluation of the influence of whole and defatted flaxseed on satiety, glucose, and leptin levels of women in the late postoperative stage of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Larissa Cohen; Junia Meira; Gigliane Menegati Cosendey; Aline Fonseca Pereira de Souza; Fernanda Mattos; João Régis Ivar Carneiro; Eliane Lopes Rosado
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Glycaemic index of meals affects appetite sensation but not energy balance in active males.

Authors:  Mei-Yi Wu; Joanna L Bowtell; Craig A Williams
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Metabolic response to high-carbohydrate and low-carbohydrate meals in a nonhuman primate model.

Authors:  Elisa Fabbrini; Paul B Higgins; Faidon Magkos; Raul A Bastarrachea; V Saroja Voruganti; Anthony G Comuzzie; Robert E Shade; Amalia Gastaldelli; Jay D Horton; Daniela Omodei; Bruce W Patterson; Samuel Klein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 4.310

7.  The effect of the macronutrient composition of breakfast on satiety and cognitive function in undergraduate students.

Authors:  Christine H Emilien; Robert West; James H Hollis
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 8.  Low glycaemic index diets for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Christine Clar; Lena Al-Khudairy; Emma Loveman; Sarah Am Kelly; Louise Hartley; Nadine Flowers; Roberta Germanò; Gary Frost; Karen Rees
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-31

9.  Reducing the glycemic index or carbohydrate content of mixed meals reduces postprandial glycemia and insulinemia over the entire day but does not affect satiety.

Authors:  Ann G Liu; Marlene M Most; Meghan M Brashear; William D Johnson; William T Cefalu; Frank L Greenway
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  A High-Protein, Low Glycemic Index Diet Suppresses Hunger but Not Weight Regain After Weight Loss: Results From a Large, 3-Years Randomized Trial (PREVIEW).

Authors:  Ruixin Zhu; Mikael Fogelholm; Thomas M Larsen; Sally D Poppitt; Marta P Silvestre; Pia S Vestentoft; Elli Jalo; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Maija Huttunen-Lenz; Moira A Taylor; Gareth Stratton; Nils Swindell; Niina E Kaartinen; Tony Lam; Teodora Handjieva-Darlenska; Svetoslav Handjiev; Wolfgang Schlicht; J Alfredo Martinez; Radhika V Seimon; Amanda Sainsbury; Ian A Macdonald; Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga; Jennie Brand-Miller; Anne Raben
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.