OBJECTIVE: To identify specific ECG and clinical predictors that separate atherosclerotic sudden cardiac death (SCD) from incident coronary heart disease (CHD) (non-fatal events and non-sudden death) in the combined cohorts of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study and the Cardiovascular Health Study. METHODS: This analysis included 18,497 participants (58% females, 24% black individuals, mean age 58 years) who were initially free of clinical CHD. A competing risk analysis was conducted to examine the prognostic significance of baseline clinical characteristics and an extensive electronic database of ECG measurements for prediction of 229 cases of SCD as a first event versus 2297 incident CHD cases (2122 non-fatal events and 175 non-sudden death) that occurred during a median follow-up time of 13 years in the Cardiovascular Health Study and 14 years in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. RESULTS: After adjusting for common CHD risk factors, a number of clinical characteristics and ECG measurements were independently predictive of SCD and CHD. However, the risk of SCD versus incident CHD was significantly different for race/ethnicity, hypertension, body mass index (BMI), heart rate, QTc, abnormally inverted T wave in any ECG lead group and level of ST elevation in V2. Black race/ethnicity (compared to non-black) was predictive of high SCD risk but less risk of incident CHD (p value for differences in the risk (HR) for SCD versus CHD <0.0001). Hypertension, increased heart rate, prolongation of QTc and abnormally inverted T wave were stronger predictors of high SCD risk compared to CHD (p value=0.0460, 0.0398, 0.0158 and 0.0265, respectively). BMI was not predictive of incident CHD but was predictive of high SCD risk in a quadratic fashion (p value=0.0220). On the other hand, elevated ST height as measured at the J point and that measured at 60 ms after the J point in V2 were not predictive of SCD but were predictive of high incident CHD risk (p value=0.0251 and 0.0155, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SCD and CHD have many risk factors in common. Hypertension, race/ethnicity, BMI, heart rate, QTc, abnormally inverted T wave in any ECG lead group and level of ST elevation in V2 have the potential to separate between the risks of SCD and CHD. These results need to be validated in another cohort.
OBJECTIVE: To identify specific ECG and clinical predictors that separate atherosclerotic sudden cardiac death (SCD) from incident coronary heart disease (CHD) (non-fatal events and non-sudden death) in the combined cohorts of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study and the Cardiovascular Health Study. METHODS: This analysis included 18,497 participants (58% females, 24% black individuals, mean age 58 years) who were initially free of clinical CHD. A competing risk analysis was conducted to examine the prognostic significance of baseline clinical characteristics and an extensive electronic database of ECG measurements for prediction of 229 cases of SCD as a first event versus 2297 incident CHD cases (2122 non-fatal events and 175 non-sudden death) that occurred during a median follow-up time of 13 years in the Cardiovascular Health Study and 14 years in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. RESULTS: After adjusting for common CHD risk factors, a number of clinical characteristics and ECG measurements were independently predictive of SCD and CHD. However, the risk of SCD versus incident CHD was significantly different for race/ethnicity, hypertension, body mass index (BMI), heart rate, QTc, abnormally inverted T wave in any ECG lead group and level of ST elevation in V2. Black race/ethnicity (compared to non-black) was predictive of high SCD risk but less risk of incident CHD (p value for differences in the risk (HR) for SCD versus CHD <0.0001). Hypertension, increased heart rate, prolongation of QTc and abnormally inverted T wave were stronger predictors of high SCD risk compared to CHD (p value=0.0460, 0.0398, 0.0158 and 0.0265, respectively). BMI was not predictive of incident CHD but was predictive of high SCD risk in a quadratic fashion (p value=0.0220). On the other hand, elevated ST height as measured at the J point and that measured at 60 ms after the J point in V2 were not predictive of SCD but were predictive of high incident CHD risk (p value=0.0251 and 0.0155, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:SCD and CHD have many risk factors in common. Hypertension, race/ethnicity, BMI, heart rate, QTc, abnormally inverted T wave in any ECG lead group and level of ST elevation in V2 have the potential to separate between the risks of SCD and CHD. These results need to be validated in another cohort.
Authors: Sabine M J M Straus; Jan A Kors; Marie L De Bruin; Cornelis S van der Hooft; Albert Hofman; Jan Heeringa; Jaap W Deckers; J Herre Kingma; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Jacqueline C M Witteman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: L P Fried; N O Borhani; P Enright; C D Furberg; J M Gardin; R A Kronmal; L H Kuller; T A Manolio; M B Mittelmark; A Newman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 1991-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Xavier Jouven; Jean-Philippe Empana; Peter J Schwartz; Michel Desnos; Dominique Courbon; Pierre Ducimetière Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P M Rautaharju; L P Park; J S Gottdiener; D Siscovick; R Boineau; V Smith; N R Powe Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: P N Casale; R B Devereux; P Kligfield; R R Eisenberg; D H Miller; B S Chaudhary; M C Phillips Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1985-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Anneke de Torbal; Jan A Kors; Gerard van Herpen; Simon Meij; Stefan Nelwan; Maarten L Simoons; Eric Boersma Journal: Cardiology Date: 2004-02-12 Impact factor: 1.869
Authors: Stephanie E Chiuve; Qi Sun; Roopinder K Sandhu; Usha Tedrow; Nancy R Cook; JoAnn E Manson; Christine M Albert Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2015-12-01
Authors: Yan Chen; Alex R Chang; Mara A McAdams DeMarco; Lesley A Inker; Kunihiro Matsushita; Shoshana H Ballew; Josef Coresh; Morgan E Grams Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Wesley T O'Neal; Matthew J Singleton; Jason D Roberts; Larisa G Tereshchenko; Nona Sotoodehnia; Lin Y Chen; Gregory M Marcus; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2017-10
Authors: Lin Y Chen; Nona Sotoodehnia; Petra Bůžková; Faye L Lopez; Laura M Yee; Susan R Heckbert; Ronald Prineas; Elsayed Z Soliman; Selcuk Adabag; Suma Konety; Aaron R Folsom; David Siscovick; Alvaro Alonso Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Rajat Deo; Faye L Norby; Ronit Katz; Nona Sotoodehnia; Selcuk Adabag; Christopher R DeFilippi; Bryan Kestenbaum; Lin Y Chen; Susan R Heckbert; Aaron R Folsom; Richard A Kronmal; Suma Konety; Kristen K Patton; David Siscovick; Michael G Shlipak; Alvaro Alonso Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Monika M Safford; Todd M Brown; Paul M Muntner; Raegan W Durant; Stephen Glasser; Jewell H Halanych; James M Shikany; Ronald J Prineas; Tandaw Samdarshi; Vera A Bittner; Cora E Lewis; Christopher Gamboa; Mary Cushman; Virginia Howard; George Howard Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ayman A Hussein; John S Gottdiener; Traci M Bartz; Nona Sotoodehnia; Christopher deFilippi; Timm Dickfeld; Rajat Deo; David Siscovick; Phyllis K Stein; Donald Lloyd-Jones Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Fenglong Xie; Lisandro D Colantonio; Jeffrey R Curtis; Meredith L Kilgore; Emily B Levitan; Keri L Monda; Monika M Safford; Ben Taylor; Mark Woodward; Paul Muntner Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 2.890