Literature DB >> 21775428

The atypical response regulator protein ChxR has structural characteristics and dimer interface interactions that are unique within the OmpR/PhoB subfamily.

John M Hickey1, Scott Lovell, Kevin P Battaile, Lei Hu, C Russell Middaugh, P Scott Hefty.   

Abstract

Typically as a result of phosphorylation, OmpR/PhoB response regulators form homodimers through a receiver domain as an integral step in transcriptional activation. Phosphorylation stabilizes the ionic and hydrophobic interactions between monomers. Recent studies have shown that some response regulators retain functional activity in the absence of phosphorylation and are termed atypical response regulators. The two currently available receiver domain structures of atypical response regulators are very similar to their phospho-accepting homologs, and their propensity to form homodimers is generally retained. An atypical response regulator, ChxR, from Chlamydia trachomatis, was previously reported to form homodimers; however, the residues critical to this interaction have not been elucidated. We hypothesize that the intra- and intermolecular interactions involved in forming a transcriptionally competent ChxR are distinct from the canonical phosphorylation (activation) paradigm in the OmpR/PhoB response regulator subfamily. To test this hypothesis, structural and functional studies were performed on the receiver domain of ChxR. Two crystal structures of the receiver domain were solved with the recently developed method using triiodo compound I3C. These structures revealed many characteristics unique to OmpR/PhoB subfamily members: typical or atypical. Included was the absence of two α-helices present in all other OmpR/PhoB response regulators. Functional studies on various dimer interface residues demonstrated that ChxR forms relatively stable homodimers through hydrophobic interactions, and disruption of these can be accomplished with the introduction of a charged residue within the dimer interface. A gel shift study with monomeric ChxR supports that dimerization through the receiver domain is critical for interaction with DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775428      PMCID: PMC3173177          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.220574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  50 in total

1.  The finer things in X-ray diffraction data collection.

Authors:  J W Pflugrath
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1999-10

2.  EnvZ-OmpR interaction and osmoregulation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sheng Jian Cai; Masayori Inouye
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Two-component signal transduction.

Authors:  A M Stock; V L Robinson; P N Goudreau
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  Residue R113 is essential for PhoP dimerization and function: a residue buried in the asymmetric PhoP dimer interface determined in the PhoPN three-dimensional crystal structure.

Authors:  Yinghua Chen; Catherine Birck; Jean-Pierre Samama; F Marion Hulett
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Autoregulation of Helicobacter pylori Fur revealed by functional analysis of the iron-binding site.

Authors:  Isabel Delany; Gunther Spohn; Ana-Beatriz F Pacheco; Raffaele Ieva; Cristina Alaimo; Rino Rappuoli; Vincenzo Scarlato
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling.

Authors:  P Schuck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Growth phase-dependent regulation of target gene promoters for binding of the essential orphan response regulator HP1043 of Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  Isabel Delany; Gunther Spohn; Rino Rappuoli; Vincenzo Scarlato
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Global stage-specific gene regulation during the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Tracy L Nicholson; Lynn Olinger; Kimberley Chong; Gary Schoolnik; Richard S Stephens
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Quantitative analysis of protein far UV circular dichroism spectra by neural networks.

Authors:  G Böhm; R Muhr; R Jaenicke
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1992-04

10.  Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Robert J Belland; Guangming Zhong; Deborah D Crane; Daniel Hogan; Daniel Sturdevant; Jyotika Sharma; Wandy L Beatty; Harlan D Caldwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 12.779

View more
  10 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis ChxR is a transcriptional regulator of virulence factors that function in in vivo host-pathogen interactions.

Authors:  Chunfu Yang; Laszlo Kari; Gail L Sturdevant; Lihua Song; Michael John Patton; Claire E Couch; Jillian M Ilgenfritz; Timothy R Southern; William M Whitmire; Michael Briones; Christine Bonner; Chris Grant; Pinzhao Hu; Grant McClarty; Harlan D Caldwell
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Atypical OmpR/PhoB subfamily response regulator GlnR of actinomycetes functions as a homodimer, stabilized by the unphosphorylated conserved Asp-focused charge interactions.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Ying Wang; Xiaobiao Han; Zilong Zhang; Chengyuan Wang; Jin Wang; Huaiyu Yang; Yinhua Lu; Weihong Jiang; Guo-Ping Zhao; Peng Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  To ∼P or Not to ∼P? Non-canonical activation by two-component response regulators.

Authors:  Stuti K Desai; Linda J Kenney
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  The aspartate-less receiver (ALR) domains: distribution, structure and function.

Authors:  Andrew F Maule; David P Wright; Joshua J Weiner; Lanlan Han; Francis C Peterson; Brian F Volkman; Nicholas R Silvaggi; Andrew T Ulijasz
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Conformational Dynamics of Response Regulator RegX3 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ashfaq Ahmad; Yongfei Cai; Xingqiang Chen; Jianwei Shuai; Aidong Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Following the Footsteps of Chlamydial Gene Regulation.

Authors:  D Domman; M Horn
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Use of restrained molecular dynamics to predict the conformations of phosphorylated receiver domains in two-component signaling systems.

Authors:  Clay A Foster; Ann H West
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-11-20

8.  Atypical response regulator ChxR from Chlamydia trachomatis is structurally poised for DNA binding.

Authors:  Michael L Barta; John M Hickey; Asokan Anbanandam; Kevin Dyer; Michal Hammel; P Scott Hefty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Response regulator heterodimer formation controls a key stage in Streptomyces development.

Authors:  Mahmoud M Al-Bassam; Maureen J Bibb; Matthew J Bush; Govind Chandra; Mark J Buttner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Identification of a GrgA-Euo-HrcA Transcriptional Regulatory Network in Chlamydia.

Authors:  Wurihan Wurihan; Yi Zou; Alec M Weber; Korri Weldon; Yehong Huang; Xiaofeng Bao; Chengsheng Zhu; Xiang Wu; Yaqun Wang; Zhao Lai; Huizhou Fan
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 6.496

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.