Literature DB >> 21775416

A Sox10 enhancer element common to the otic placode and neural crest is activated by tissue-specific paralogs.

Paola Betancur1, Tatjana Sauka-Spengler, Marianne Bronner.   

Abstract

The otic placode, a specialized region of ectoderm, gives rise to components of the inner ear and shares many characteristics with the neural crest, including expression of the key transcription factor Sox10. Here, we show that in avian embryos, a highly conserved cranial neural crest enhancer, Sox10E2, also controls the onset of Sox10 expression in the otic placode. Interestingly, we show that different combinations of paralogous transcription factors (Sox8, Pea3 and cMyb versus Sox9, Ets1 and cMyb) are required to mediate Sox10E2 activity in the ear and neural crest, respectively. Mutating their binding motifs within Sox10E2 greatly reduces enhancer activity in the ear. Moreover, simultaneous knockdown of Sox8, Pea3 and cMyb eliminates not only the enhancer-driven reporter expression, but also the onset of endogenous Sox10 expression in the ear. Rescue experiments confirm that the specific combination of Myb together with Sox8 and Pea3 is responsible for the onset of Sox10 expression in the otic placode, as opposed to Myb plus Sox9 and Ets1 for neural crest Sox10 expression. Whereas SUMOylation of Sox8 is not required for the initial onset of Sox10 expression, it is necessary for later otic vesicle formation. This new role of Sox8, Pea3 and cMyb in controlling Sox10 expression via a common otic/neural crest enhancer suggests an evolutionarily conserved function for the combination of paralogous transcription factors in these tissues of distinct embryological origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775416      PMCID: PMC3152925          DOI: 10.1242/dev.057836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  33 in total

1.  Unique and selective effects of five Ets family members, Elf3, Ets1, Ets2, PEA3, and PU.1, on the promoter of the type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor gene.

Authors:  Janel L Kopp; Phillip J Wilder; Michelle Desler; Jae-Hwan Kim; Jingwen Hou; Tamara Nowling; Angie Rizzino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Spatial relations between avian craniofacial neural crest and paraxial mesoderm cells.

Authors:  Darrell J R Evans; Drew M Noden
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.780

3.  Sox10 overexpression induces neural crest-like cells from all dorsoventral levels of the neural tube but inhibits differentiation.

Authors:  Sonja J McKeown; Vivian M Lee; Marianne Bronner-Fraser; Donald F Newgreen; Peter G Farlie
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  SoxE factors function equivalently during neural crest and inner ear development and their activity is regulated by SUMOylation.

Authors:  Kimberly M Taylor; Carole Labonne
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.270

5.  The evolution and elaboration of vertebrate neural crest cells.

Authors:  Clare V H Baker
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Genomic code for Sox10 activation reveals a key regulatory enhancer for cranial neural crest.

Authors:  Paola Betancur; Marianne Bronner-Fraser; Tatjana Sauka-Spengler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A polyomavirus enhancer A-binding protein-3 site and Ets-2 protein have a major role in the 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response of the human stromelysin gene.

Authors:  G Buttice; M Kurkinen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  SOX10 maintains multipotency and inhibits neuronal differentiation of neural crest stem cells.

Authors:  Jaesang Kim; Liching Lo; Emma Dormand; David J Anderson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The transcriptional control of trunk neural crest induction, survival, and delamination.

Authors:  Martin Cheung; Marie-Christine Chaboissier; Anita Mynett; Elizabeth Hirst; Andreas Schedl; James Briscoe
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.270

10.  Competence, specification and commitment in otic placode induction.

Authors:  A K Groves; M Bronner-Fraser
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  28 in total

1.  Migration pathways of sacral neural crest during development of lower urogenital tract innervation.

Authors:  Carrie B Wiese; Karen K Deal; Sara J Ireland; V Ashley Cantrell; E Michelle Southard-Smith
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  PleiotRHOpic: Rho pathways are essential for all stages of Neural Crest development.

Authors:  Philippe Fort; Eric Théveneau
Journal:  Small GTPases       Date:  2014-03-10

Review 3.  What is bad in cancer is good in the embryo: importance of EMT in neural crest development.

Authors:  Laura Kerosuo; Marianne Bronner-Fraser
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 4.  Neural crest lineage analysis: from past to future trajectory.

Authors:  Weiyi Tang; Marianne E Bronner
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Lsd1 interacts with cMyb to demethylate repressive histone marks and maintain inner ear progenitor identity.

Authors:  Mohi Ahmed; Andrea Streit
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Disparate expression specificities coded by a shared Hox-C enhancer.

Authors:  Steve W Miller; James W Posakony
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Tissue specific regulation of the chick Sox10E1 enhancer by different Sox family members.

Authors:  Christina Murko; Marianne E Bronner
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Foxi3 is necessary for the induction of the chick otic placode in response to FGF signaling.

Authors:  Safia B Khatri; Renée K Edlund; Andrew K Groves
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  An engineered three-dimensional stem cell niche in the inner ear by applying a nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel with a sustained-release neurotrophic factor delivery system.

Authors:  Hsiang-Tsun Chang; Rachel A Heuer; Andrew M Oleksijew; Kyle S Coots; Christian B Roque; Kevin T Nella; Tammy L McGuire; Akihiro J Matsuoka
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  The role of post-translational modifications in hearing and deafness.

Authors:  Susana Mateo Sánchez; Stephen D Freeman; Laurence Delacroix; Brigitte Malgrange
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.