Literature DB >> 21775130

Frequency and severity of skin reactions in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy, the usefulness of two assessment instruments - a pilot study.

L Sharp1, H Johansson, Y Landin, I-M Moegelin, M Bergenmar.   

Abstract

Acute radiation skin reactions (ARSR) are a major problem in curative radiotherapy (RT). A number of studies have failed to show a positive effect of different skin care products to reduce or prevent ARSR. The aims for this study were to describe frequency and severity of ARSR in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant RT and to test the suitability in clinical use of two assessment instruments. A majority (93%) of the 93 patients with breast cancer included in this study developed ARSR, most of them mild reactions. Low scores for pain and itching (VAS) were reported. ARSR were assessed using the modified version of RTOG/EORTC acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria and the World Health Organisation (WHO) grading system for acute and subacute toxicity by two independent observers after the completion of RT. The percentages of discordant assessment between the two observers were 21% for the WHO scale and 32% for the RTOG/EORTC. Severe ARSR, classified as grades 2-4 on both instruments resulted in good agreement between the two instruments. However, the assessments using RTOG/EORTC resulted in an almost 10% higher proportion of severe ARSR. Comparisons of health related quality of life and sleep revealed no statistically significant differences between patients with mild or severe ARSR assessed by the RTOG/EORTC scale with the exception of cognitive functioning. The use of assessment instruments to describe treatment-related symptoms is complicated and clinical experience is not always enough. More research is needed to validate these instruments to guarantee sound and precise assessments.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775130     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  9 in total

1.  Photochemical internalization-mediated delivery of chemotherapeutic agents in human breast tumor cell lines.

Authors:  Marlon S Mathews; Van Vo; En-Chung Shih; Genesis Zamora; Chung-Ho Sun; Steen J Madsen; Henry Hirschberg
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.567

2.  Novel hyaluronan formulation for preventing acute skin reactions in breast during radiotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Asal Rahimi; Osama Mohamad; Kevin Albuquerque; D W Nathan Kim; Diana Chen; Kimberly Thomas; Rachel Wooldridge; Aeisha Rivers; Marilyn Leitch; Roshni Rao; Barbara Haley; Chul Ahn; Dan Garwood; Ann Spangler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Are there biologic differences between male and female breast cancer explaining inferior outcome of men despite equal stage and treatment?!

Authors:  A-C Müller; C Gani; H M E Rehm; F Eckert; M Bamberg; T Hehr; M Weinmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Repeated measures analyses of dermatitis symptom evolution in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy in a phase 3 randomized trial of mometasone furoate vs placebo (N06C4 [alliance]).

Authors:  Terence T Sio; Pamela J Atherton; Brandon J Birckhead; David J Schwartz; Jeff A Sloan; Drew K Seisler; James A Martenson; Charles L Loprinzi; Patricia C Griffin; Roscoe F Morton; Jon C Anders; Thomas J Stoffel; Robert E Haselow; Rex B Mowat; Michelle A Neben Wittich; James D Bearden; Robert C Miller
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Characterization of skin reactions and pain reported by patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer at different sites.

Authors:  Jennifer S Gewandter; Joanna Walker; Charles E Heckler; Gary R Morrow; Julie L Ryan
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2013-12

6.  Is there agreement between evaluators that used two scoring systems to measure acute radiation dermatitis?

Authors:  Marceila de Andrade Fuzissaki; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Thais de Oliveira Gozzo; Marcelo de Almeida Maia; Paula Philbert Lajolo Canto; Yara Cristina de Paiva Maia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Randomized, self-controlled, prospective assessment of the efficacy of mometasone furoate local application in reducing acute radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Yao Liao; Gang Feng; Tangzhi Dai; Fengjiao Long; Junfei Tang; Yuanxue Pu; Xuhai Zheng; Sui Cao; Shan Xu; Xiaobo Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Randomized, prospective assessment of moisturizer efficacy for the treatment of radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Kenji Sekiguchi; Mami Ogita; Keiko Akahane; Chiori Haga; Ryoko Ito; Satoru Arai; Yasushi Ishida; Yoichiro Tsukada; Jiro Kawamori
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  External Validation of a Predictive Model for Acute Skin Radiation Toxicity in the REQUITE Breast Cohort.

Authors:  Tim Rattay; Petra Seibold; Miguel E Aguado-Barrera; Manuel Altabas; David Azria; Gillian C Barnett; Renée Bultijnck; Jenny Chang-Claude; Ananya Choudhury; Charlotte E Coles; Alison M Dunning; Rebecca M Elliott; Marie-Pierre Farcy Jacquet; Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Kerstie Johnson; Anusha Müller; Giselle Post; Tiziana Rancati; Victoria Reyes; Barry S Rosenstein; Dirk De Ruysscher; Maria C de Santis; Elena Sperk; Hilary Stobart; R Paul Symonds; Begoña Taboada-Valladares; Ana Vega; Liv Veldeman; Adam J Webb; Catharine M West; Riccardo Valdagni; Christopher J Talbot
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.