Literature DB >> 21774882

Laparoscopic entry: a review of Canadian general surgical practice.

Christopher Compeau1, Natalie T McLeod, Artin Ternamian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has gained popularity over open conventional surgery as it offers benefits to both patients and health care practitioners. Although the overall risk of complications during laparoscopic surgery is recognized to be lower than during laparotomy, inadvertent serious complications still occur. Creation of the pneumoperitoneum and placement of laparoscopic ports remain a critical first step during endoscopic surgery. It is estimated that up to 50% of laparoscopic complications are entry-related, and most injury-related litigations are trocar-related. We sought to evaluate the current practice of laparoscopic entry among Canadian general surgeons.
METHODS: We conducted a national survey to identify general surgeon preferences for laparoscopic entry. Specifically, we sought to survey surgeons using the membership database from the Canadian Association of General Surgeons (CAGS) with regards to entry methods, access instruments, port insertion sites and patient safety profiles. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was used as a representative general surgical procedure.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 248 of 1000 (24.8%) registered members of CAGS. Respondents included both community and academic surgeons, with and without formal laparoscopic fellowship training. The demographic profile of respondents was consistent nationally. A substantial proportion of general surgeons (> 80%) prefer the open primary entry technique, use the Hasson trocar and cannula and favour the periumbilical port site, irrespective of patient weight or history of peritoneal adhesions. One-third of surgeons surveyed use Veress needle insufflation in their surgical practices. More than 50% of respondents witnessed complications related to primary laparoscopic trocar insertion.
CONCLUSION: General surgeons in Canada use the open primary entry technique, with the Hasson trocar and cannula applied periumbilically to establish a pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. This surgical approach is remarkably consistent nationally, although considerably variant across other surgical subspecialties. Peritoneal entry remains an important patient safety issue that requires ongoing evaluation and study to ensure translation into safe contemporary clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21774882      PMCID: PMC3195650          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.011210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  32 in total

1.  Open laparoscopy: 29-year experience.

Authors:  H M Hasson; C Rotman; N Rana; N A Kumari
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  A String; E Berber; A Foroutani; J R Macho; J M Pearl; A E Siperstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Neudecker; S Sauerland; E Neugebauer; R Bergamaschi; H J Bonjer; A Cuschieri; K-H Fuchs; Ch Jacobi; F W Jansen; A-M Koivusalo; A Lacy; M J McMahon; B Millat; W Schwenk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques.

Authors:  Malcolm G Munro
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Complications during set-up procedures for laparoscopy in gynecology: open laparoscopy does not reduce the risk of major complications.

Authors:  C Chapron; L Cravello; N Chopin; G Kreiker; B Blanc; J B Dubuisson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy.

Authors:  H M Hasson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology. Results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Chapron; A Fauconnier; F Goffinet; G Bréart; J B Dubuisson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries.

Authors:  J G Chandler; S L Corson; L W Way
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry.

Authors:  David Molloy; Philip D Kaloo; Michael Cooper; Tuan V Nguyen
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.100

10.  Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique.

Authors:  Frank Willem Jansen; Wendela Kolkman; Erica A Bakkum; Cor D de Kroon; Trudy C M Trimbos-Kemper; J Baptist Trimbos
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  10 in total

1.  The safety and feasibility of reoperation for the treatment of hepatolithiasis by laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Ju Tian; Jian-wei Li; Jian Chen; Yu-dong Fan; Ping Bie; Shu-guang Wang; Shu-guo Zheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Open Versus Closed Laparoscopy: Yet an Unresolved Controversy.

Authors:  Milan Kumar Taye; Syed Abul Fazal; David Pegu; Dayanada Saikia
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  David Earle; J Scott Roth; Alan Saber; Steve Haggerty; Joel F Bradley; Robert Fanelli; Raymond Price; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Surgical Approaches for Common Gynecologic and Obstetrics Surgeries.

Authors:  Ahmed Samy El-Agwany
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-02

5.  The integration of minimally invasive surgery in surgical practice in a Canadian setting: results from 2 consecutive province-wide practice surveys of general surgeons over a 5-year period.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Olivier Mailloux; Mony Chhiv; Roger C Grégoire; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Surgeons' requirements for a surgical support system to improve laparoscopic access.

Authors:  Moritz Spiller; Marcus Bruennel; Victoria Grosse; Thomas Sühn; Nazila Esmaeili; Jessica Stockheim; Salmai Turial; Roland Croner; Axel Boese; Michael Friebe; Alfredo Illanes
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.030

7.  Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Maurizio Mannino; Giovanni Cappello; Andrea Di Stefano; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-06-13

8.  Multiple-, but not single-, dose of parecoxib reduces shoulder pain after gynecologic laparoscopy.

Authors:  Hufei Zhang; Haihua Shu; Lu Yang; Minghui Cao; Jingjun Zhang; Kexuan Liu; Liangcan Xiao; Xuyu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Implementation of a Cross-specialty Training Program in Basic Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Flemming Bjerrum; Jette Led Sorensen; Jette Thinggaard; Jeanett Strandbygaard; Lars Konge
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  A novel Veress needle mechanism that reduces overshooting after puncturing the abdominal wall.

Authors:  Roelf R Postema; David Cefai; Bart van Straten; Rein Miedema; Latifa Lesmana Hardjo; Jenny Dankelman; Felix Nickel; Tim Horeman-Franse
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.