Literature DB >> 21774423

Fire effects on temperate forest soil C and N storage.

Lucas E Nave1, Eric D Vance, Christopher W Swanston, Peter S Curtis.   

Abstract

Temperate forest soils store globally significant amounts of carbon (C) and n class="Chemical">nitrogen (N). Understanding how soil pools of these two elements change in response to disturbance and management is critical to maintaining ecosystem services such as forest productivity, greenhouse gas mitigation, and water resource protection. Fire is one of the principal disturbances acting on forest soil C and N storage and is also the subject of enormous management efforts. In the present article, we use meta-analysis to quantify fire effects on temperate forest soil C and N storage. Across a combined total of 468 soil C and N response ratios from 57 publications (concentrations and pool sizes), fire had significant overall effects on soil C (-26%) and soil N (-22%). The impacts of fire on forest floors were significantly different from its effects on mineral soils. Fires reduced forest floor C and N storage (pool sizes only) by an average of 59% and 50%, respectively, but the concentrations of these two elements did not change. Prescribed fires caused smaller reductions in forest floor C and N storage (-46% and -35%) than wildfires (-67% and -69%), and the presence of hardwoods also mitigated fire impacts. Burned forest floors recovered their C and N pools in an average of 128 and 103 years, respectively. Among mineral soils, there were no significant changes in C or N storage, but C and N concentrations declined significantly (-11% and -12%, respectively). Mineral soil C and N concentrations were significantly affected by fire type, with no change following prescribed burns, but significant reductions in response to wildfires. Geographic variation in fire effects on mineral soil C and N storage underscores the need for region-specific fire management plans, and the role of fire type in mediating C and N shifts (especially in the forest floor) indicates that averting wildfires through prescribed burning is desirable from a soils perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21774423     DOI: 10.1890/10-0660.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Wildfire and forest disease interaction lead to greater loss of soil nutrients and carbon.

Authors:  Richard C Cobb; Ross K Meentemeyer; David M Rizzo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Reforestation can sequester two petagrams of carbon in US topsoils in a century.

Authors:  Lucas E Nave; Grant M Domke; Kathryn L Hofmeister; Umakant Mishra; Charles H Perry; Brian F Walters; Christopher W Swanston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Allocation Strategies of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus at Species and Community Levels With Recovery After Wildfire.

Authors:  Zhaopeng Song; Xuemei Wang; Yanhong Liu; Yiqi Luo; Zhaolei Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Effects of Mowing and Prescribed Fire on Plant Community Structure and Function in Rare Coastal Sandplains, Nantucket Island, MA, USA.

Authors:  Helen Mills Poulos; Rachael S Freeman; Jennifer M Karberg; Karen C Beattie; Danielle I O'Dell; Kelly A Omand
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.644

5.  Nitrogen balance along a northern boreal forest fire chronosequence.

Authors:  Marjo Palviainen; Jukka Pumpanen; Frank Berninger; Kaisa Ritala; Baoli Duan; Jussi Heinonsalo; Hui Sun; Egle Köster; Kajar Köster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.