Literature DB >> 21774014

The most frequently encountered volatile contaminants of essential oils and plant extracts introduced during the isolation procedure: fast and easy profiling.

Niko S Radulović1, Polina D Blagojević.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Unfortunately, contaminants of synthetic/artificial origin are sometimes identified as major constituents of essential oils or plant extracts and considered to be biologically active native plant metabolites.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the possibility of early recognition and to create a list of some of the most common semi-volatile contaminants of essential oils and plant extracts.
METHODOLOGY: Detailed GC and GC-MS analyses of the evaporation residues of six commercially available diethyl ethers and of a plastic bag hydrodistillate were performed. Average mass scans of the total ion chromatogram profiles of the analysed samples were performed.
RESULTS: Almost 200 different compounds, subdivided into two groups, were identified in the analysed samples: (i) compounds that could be only of a synthetic/artificial origin, such as butylated hydroxytoluene and o-phthalic acid esters, i.e. requiring exclusion from the list of identified plant constituents; (ii) compounds possibly of synthetic and/or natural plant origin, i.e. compounds derived from the fatty acid metabolism or products of anaerobic intracellular/microbial fermentation. Average mass scans of the total ion chromatogram profiles provide meaningful and convenient information on uncovering important solvent-derived contamination.
CONCLUSION: A database of the most common semi-volatile contaminants of essential oils and plant extracts has been generated that provides information on the likelihood of rejection or acceptance of contaminants as possible plant constituents. The suggested average mass scan approach enables fast and easy profiling of solvents, allowing even inexperienced researchers to pinpoint contaminants.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21774014     DOI: 10.1002/pca.1334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytochem Anal        ISSN: 0958-0344            Impact factor:   3.373


  1 in total

1.  Cleaning up the masses: exclusion lists to reduce contamination with HPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Kelly Hodge; Sara Ten Have; Luke Hutton; Angus I Lamond
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.044

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.