Literature DB >> 21773867

Repeatability of measured brain volume by atlas-based method using T1-weighted image.

Masami Goto1, Tosiaki Miyati, Osamu Abe, Hidemasa Takao, Tomomi Kurosu, Naoto Hayashi, Shigeki Aoki, Harushi Mori, Akira Kunimatsu, Kenji Ino, Keiichi Yano, Kuni Ohtomo.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to (1) investigate the repeatability of measured volumes using the atlas-based method in each area of the brain, and (2) validate our hypothesis that the repeatability of the measured volumes with the atlas-based method was improved by using smoothed images. T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were obtained in five healthy subjects using the 1.5-T scanner. We used Statistical Parametric Mapping 5 and WFU PickAtlas software (theory of the Talairach brain atlas). Volumes inside region-of-interest (ROI) were measured in ten sets (five subjects × right and left) on six ROIs, respectively. One set comprises five images (one subject × five 3D-T1WIs). The percentage change was defined as [100 × (measured volume-mean volume in each set)/mean volume in each set)]. As a result, the average percentage changes using non-smoothed image on each ROI were as follows: gray matter, 0.482%; white matter, 0.375%; cerebrospinal fluid images, 0.731%; hippocampus, 0.864%; orbital gyrus, 1.692%; cerebellum posterior lobe, 0.854%. Using smoothed images with large FWHM resulted in improved repeatability on orbital gyrus. This is the first report of repeatability in each brain structure and improved repeatability with smoothed images using the atlas-based method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21773867      PMCID: PMC3264725          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9412-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

Review 1.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E Courchesne; H J Chisum; J Townsend; A Cowles; J Covington; B Egaas; M Harwood; S Hinds; G A Press
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets.

Authors:  Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti; Robert A Kraft; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Patterns of age-related shrinkage in cerebellum and brainstem observed in vivo using three-dimensional MRI volumetry.

Authors:  A R Luft; M Skalej; J B Schulz; D Welte; R Kolb; K Bürk; T Klockgether; K Voight
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data.

Authors:  Jorge Jovicich; Silvester Czanner; Douglas Greve; Elizabeth Haley; Andre van der Kouwe; Randy Gollub; David Kennedy; Franz Schmitt; Gregory Brown; James Macfall; Bruce Fischl; Anders Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Unified segmentation.

Authors:  John Ashburner; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Age-related changes in regional brain volume evaluated by atlas-based method.

Authors:  Wataru Gonoi; Osamu Abe; Hidenori Yamasue; Haruyasu Yamada; Yoshitaka Masutani; Hidemasa Takao; Kiyoto Kasai; Shigeki Aoki; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood.

Authors:  A Pfefferbaum; D H Mathalon; E V Sullivan; J M Rawles; R B Zipursky; K O Lim
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1994-09

9.  Differentiating AD from aging using semiautomated measurement of hippocampal atrophy rates.

Authors:  Josephine Barnes; Rachael I Scahill; Richard G Boyes; Chris Frost; Emma B Lewis; Charlotte L Rossor; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry.

Authors:  Alex D Leow; Andrea D Klunder; Clifford R Jack; Arthur W Toga; Anders M Dale; Matt A Bernstein; Paula J Britson; Jeffrey L Gunter; Chadwick P Ward; Jennifer L Whitwell; Bret J Borowski; Adam S Fleisher; Nick C Fox; Danielle Harvey; John Kornak; Norbert Schuff; Colin Studholme; Gene E Alexander; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra provides reduced effect of scanner for cortex volumetry with atlas-based method in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Masami Goto; Osamu Abe; Shigeki Aoki; Naoto Hayashi; Tosiaki Miyati; Hidemasa Takao; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Fumio Yamashita; Hiroshi Matsuda; Harushi Mori; Akira Kunimatsu; Kenji Ino; Keiichi Yano; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Advantages of Using Both Voxel- and Surface-based Morphometry in Cortical Morphology Analysis: A Review of Various Applications.

Authors:  Masami Goto; Osamu Abe; Akifumi Hagiwara; Shohei Fujita; Koji Kamagata; Masaaki Hori; Shigeki Aoki; Takahiro Osada; Seiki Konishi; Yoshitaka Masutani; Hajime Sakamoto; Yasuaki Sakano; Shinsuke Kyogoku; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.760

3.  Repeatability of Brain Volume Measurements Made with the Atlas-based Method from T1-weighted Images Acquired Using a 0.4 Tesla Low Field MR Scanner.

Authors:  Masami Goto; Makoto Suzuki; Shinya Mizukami; Osamu Abe; Shigeki Aoki; Tosiaki Miyati; Michinari Fukuda; Tsutomu Gomi; Tohoru Takeda
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.471

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.