Literature DB >> 21772078

Introducing an on-line adaptive procedure for prostate image guided intensity modulate proton therapy.

M Zhang1, D C Westerly, T R Mackie.   

Abstract

With on-line image guidance (IG), prostate shifts relative to the bony anatomy can be corrected by realigning the patient with respect to the treatment fields. In image guided intensity modulated proton therapy (IG-IMPT), because the proton range is more sensitive to the material it travels through, the realignment may introduce large dose variations. This effect is studied in this work and an on-line adaptive procedure is proposed to restore the planned dose to the target. A 2D anthropomorphic phantom was constructed from a real prostate patient's CT image. Two-field laterally opposing spot 3D-modulation and 24-field full arc distal edge tracking (DET) plans were generated with a prescription of 70 Gy to the planning target volume. For the simulated delivery, we considered two types of procedures: the non-adaptive procedure and the on-line adaptive procedure. In the non-adaptive procedure, only patient realignment to match the prostate location in the planning CT was performed. In the on-line adaptive procedure, on top of the patient realignment, the kinetic energy for each individual proton pencil beam was re-determined from the on-line CT image acquired after the realignment and subsequently used for delivery. Dose distributions were re-calculated for individual fractions for different plans and different delivery procedures. The results show, without adaptive, that both the 3D-modulation and the DET plans experienced delivered dose degradation by having large cold or hot spots in the prostate. The DET plan had worse dose degradation than the 3D-modulation plan. The adaptive procedure effectively restored the planned dose distribution in the DET plan, with delivered prostate D(98%), D(50%) and D(2%) values less than 1% from the prescription. In the 3D-modulation plan, in certain cases the adaptive procedure was not effective to reduce the delivered dose degradation and yield similar results as the non-adaptive procedure. In conclusion, based on this 2D phantom study, by updating the proton pencil beam energy from the on-line image after realignment, this on-line adaptive procedure is necessary and effective for the DET-based IG-IMPT. Without dose re-calculation and re-optimization, it could be easily incorporated into the clinical workflow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21772078     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Proton dose calculation on scatter-corrected CBCT image: Feasibility study for adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Yang-Kyun Park; Gregory C Sharp; Justin Phillips; Brian A Winey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Real-time adaptive planning method for radiotherapy treatment delivery for prostate cancer patients, based on a library of plans accounting for possible anatomy configuration changes.

Authors:  Maria Antico; Peter Prinsen; Francesco Cellini; Alice Fracassi; Alfonso A Isola; David Cobben; Davide Fontanarosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mid-range probing-towards range-guided particle therapy.

Authors:  Mingli Chen; Yuncheng Zhong; Yiping Shao; Steve Jiang; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Robust contour propagation using deep learning and image registration for online adaptive proton therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed S Elmahdy; Thyrza Jagt; Roel Th Zinkstok; Yuchuan Qiao; Rahil Shahzad; Hessam Sokooti; Sahar Yousefi; Luca Incrocci; C A M Marijnen; Mischa Hoogeman; Marius Staring
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Stability of daily rectal movement and effectiveness of replanning protocols for sparing rectal doses based on the daily CT images during proton treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Maeda; Yoshitaka Sato; Kazutaka Yamamoto; Hiroyasu Tamamura; Makoto Sasaki; Nobukazu Fuwa; Shigeyuki Takamatsu; Kyo Kume
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 7.  Management of organ motion in scanned ion beam therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Bert; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.