BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays have better analytical precision and sensitivity than earlier-generation assays when measuring cardiac troponin at low concentrations. We evaluated whether use of a high-sensitivity assay could further improve risk stratification compared with a standard cardiac troponin assay. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain, 30% of whom were diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. Blood samples were drawn at the time of presentation. We measured cardiac troponin T with a standard fourth-generation assay (cTnT) and a high-sensitivity assay (hs-cTnT) (both Roche Diagnostics) and followed the patients for 24 months. RESULTS: Of the 1159 patients, 76 died and 42 developed an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prognostic accuracy of hs-cTnT for death was significantly higher [area under ROC curve (AUC) 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.84] than that of cTnT (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.76; P < 0.001). After adjustment for Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score (that included the cTnT assay result), hs-cTnT above the 99th percentile (0.014 μg/L) was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 2.60 (95% CI 1.42-4.74). Addition of hs-cTnT to the risk score improved the reclassification of patients (net reclassification improvement 0.91; 95% CI 0.67-1.14; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that this effect resulted from the better classification of patients without AMI at time of testing. hs-cTnT outperformed cTnT in the prediction of AMI during follow-up (P=0.02), but was not independently predictive for this endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations of hs-cTnT >0.014 μg/L improve the prediction of death but not subsequent AMI in unselected patients presenting with acute chest pain.
BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays have better analytical precision and sensitivity than earlier-generation assays when measuring cardiac troponin at low concentrations. We evaluated whether use of a high-sensitivity assay could further improve risk stratification compared with a standard cardiac troponin assay. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain, 30% of whom were diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. Blood samples were drawn at the time of presentation. We measured cardiac troponin T with a standard fourth-generation assay (cTnT) and a high-sensitivity assay (hs-cTnT) (both Roche Diagnostics) and followed the patients for 24 months. RESULTS: Of the 1159 patients, 76 died and 42 developed an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prognostic accuracy of hs-cTnT for death was significantly higher [area under ROC curve (AUC) 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.84] than that of cTnT (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.76; P < 0.001). After adjustment for Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score (that included the cTnT assay result), hs-cTnT above the 99th percentile (0.014 μg/L) was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 2.60 (95% CI 1.42-4.74). Addition of hs-cTnT to the risk score improved the reclassification of patients (net reclassification improvement 0.91; 95% CI 0.67-1.14; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that this effect resulted from the better classification of patients without AMI at time of testing. hs-cTnT outperformed cTnT in the prediction of AMI during follow-up (P=0.02), but was not independently predictive for this endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations of hs-cTnT >0.014 μg/L improve the prediction of death but not subsequent AMI in unselected patients presenting with acute chest pain.
Authors: Bing Yu; Maja Barbalic; Ariel Brautbar; Vijay Nambi; Ron C Hoogeveen; Weihong Tang; Thomas H Mosley; Jerome I Rotter; Christopher R deFilippi; Christopher J O'Donnell; Sekar Kathiresan; Ken Rice; Susan R Heckbert; Christie M Ballantyne; Bruce M Psaty; Eric Boerwinkle Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2012-12-16
Authors: Elise D Riley; Priscilla Y Hsue; Eric Vittinghoff; Alan H B Wu; Phillip O Coffin; Peter K Moore; Kara L Lynch Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Barbara Elisabeth Stähli; Keiko Yonekawa; Lukas Andreas Altwegg; Christophe Wyss; Danielle Hof; Philipp Fischbacher; Andreas Brauchlin; Georg Schulthess; Pierre-Alexandre Krayenbühl; Arnold von Eckardstein; Martin Hersberger; Michel Neidhart; Steffen Gay; Igor Novopashenny; Regine Wolters; Michelle Frank; Manfred Bernd Wischnewsky; Thomas Felix Lüscher; Willibald Maier Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nils A Sörensen; Sebastian Ludwig; Nataliya Makarova; Johannes T Neumann; Jonas Lehmacher; Tau S Hartikainen; Paul M Haller; Till Keller; Stefan Blankenberg; Dirk Westermann; Tanja Zeller; Niklas Schofer Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2019-09-09