Literature DB >> 21771548

Does the hepatocellular phase of gadobenate dimeglumine help to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients according to histological grade?

B Tahir1, K Sandrasegaran, R Ramaswamy, K Bertrand, R Mhapsekar, F M Akisik, R Saxena.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the role of the hepatocellular phase on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following gadobenate in characterizing the grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the MRI database from October 2004 to February 2009, performed for this Institutional Review Board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-complaint study, revealed 237 cirrhotic patients with focal liver lesions. Patients who had both a hepatocellular phase after gadobenate and pathological confirmation of HCC were included. Forty-six patients with 73 HCC were analysed independently by two reviewers for signal characteristics. Absolute contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and enhancement ratio (ER) were calculated. Univariate analysis, stepwise logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were performed.
RESULTS: The mean age was 61.3 years (range 45 to 78 years). There were 11 females and 35 males, who had 22 well-differentiated (WD HCC), 35 moderately-differentiated (MD HCC), and 16 poorly-differentiated (PD HCC) hepatocellular carcinomas. On visual analysis of the hepatocellular phase, a hyperintense or isointense lesion had a sensitivity and specificity of 45% and 76%, respectively, for WD HCC. On quantitative analysis, the only significant predictor of the grade of HCC was the ER on the hepatocellular phase (p=0.019 and 0.001 for the two reviewers in logistic regression model). On ROC analysis, an ER of >13% was 47% sensitive and 89% specific in predicting WD HCC histology.
CONCLUSION: Although the hepatocellular phase of gadobenate may help to differentiate some cases of WD HCC from the more aggressive grades, there is overlap between the different grades on qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21771548     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  2 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation of the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma with diffusion-weighted imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Mingpeng Wu; Rongbo Liu; Siyi Li; Ronghui Gao; Bin Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Quantitative analysis of multiphase magnetic resonance images may assist prediction of histopathological grade of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuping Weng; Xuru Xu; Yueming Li; Chuan Yan; Jianwei Chen; Rongping Ye; Yuemin Zhu; Liting Wen; Jinsheng Hong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.