Literature DB >> 21771101

Immunohistochemical biomarkers for bladder cancer prognosis.

Kazuhito Matsushita1, Eugene K Cha, Kazumasa Matsumoto, Shiro Baba, Thomas F Chromecki, Harun Fajkovic, Maxine Sun, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Douglas S Scherr, Shahrokh F Shariat.   

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is an especially complex and heterogeneous disease with a broad spectrum of histologic findings and potentially lethal behavior. Despite advances in surgical techniques, as well as intravesical and systemic therapies, up to 30% of patients with non-muscle-invasive UCB and 50% of patients with muscle-invasive UCB experience disease progression, recurrence, and eventual death. Standard prognostic features, such as pathologic stage and grade, have limited ability to predict the outcomes of this heterogeneous population. Current risk-stratification algorithms using clinical and pathologic parameters are limited in their prognostic ability. Molecular medicine holds the promise that clinical outcomes will be improved by more accurate prognostication and directing therapy towards the mechanisms and targets associated with the growth of an individual patient's tumor. Immunohistochemical analysis of biomarker expression has provided insight into the molecular pathogenesis of UCB and offers the potential for improving clinical decision making. Numerous candidate immunohistochemical biomarkers for patients with UCB have been identified, with those relating to the cell cycle and apoptosis/cell proliferation being the most extensively studied. The present review discusses the most promising immunohistochemical biomarkers. Special attention is paid to recent data from a multi-institutional collaboration that has implemented a regulated, phased biomarker discovery and validation pathway. Because UCB tumorigenesis and progression is a process involving multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations, multiple biomarkers need to be integrated into a prognostic signature to accurately predict outcomes. There is no doubt that biomarkers will eventually guide our clinical decision making regarding follow-up scheduling and treatment choice.
© 2011 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21771101     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02809.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  19 in total

Review 1.  Biomolecular predictors of urothelial cancer behavior and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Rink; Eugene K Cha; David Green; Jens Hansen; Brian D Robinson; Yair Lotan; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Felix K Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Margit Fisch; Douglas S Scherr; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Time-dependent biological differences in molecular markers of high-grade urothelial cancer over 7 decades (ras proteins, pTEN, uPAR, PAI-1 and MMP-9).

Authors:  Jorunn Litlekalsoy; Jens G Hostmark; Daniela Elena Costea; Martin Illemann; Ole Didrik Laerum
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Cell Cycle Markers in the Evaluation of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Jéssica Niederauer Leote da Silva; Alana Durayski Ranzi; Caroline Trainotti Carvalho; Tales Vicente Scheide; Yuri Thomé Machado Strey; Túlio Meyer Graziottin; Claudia Giuliano Bica
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Profilin 1 is a potential biomarker for bladder cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Jerome Zoidakis; Manousos Makridakis; Panagiotis G Zerefos; Vasiliki Bitsika; Sergio Esteban; Maria Frantzi; Konstantinos Stravodimos; Nikolaos P Anagnou; Maria G Roubelakis; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  UBE2C is a marker of unfavorable prognosis in bladder cancer after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Taketo Kawai; Hiroyuki Abe; Haruki Kume; Yukio Homma; Masashi Fukayama
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-06-15

6.  CD24 expression is important in male urothelial tumorigenesis and metastasis in mice and is androgen regulated.

Authors:  Jonathan B Overdevest; Kristina H Knubel; Jason E Duex; Shibu Thomas; Matthew D Nitz; Michael A Harding; Steven C Smith; Henry F Frierson; Mark Conaway; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Expression of the p12 subunit of human DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ), CDK inhibitor p21(WAF1), Cdt1, cyclin A, PCNA and Ki-67 in relation to DNA replication in individual cells.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Sufang Zhang; Dazhong Xu; Marietta Ywt Lee; Zhongtao Zhang; Ernest Yc Lee; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Diagnostic Relevance of GATA 3 Expression in Urinary Bladder Carcinoma of Divergent Differentiation and Other Histological Variants.

Authors:  Chanchal Rana; Suresh Babu; Harshita Agarwal; Atin Singhai; Madhu Kumar; Vishwajeet Singh; R J Sinha; S N Shankhwar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-18

9.  Bladder cancer: a simple model becomes complex.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Caterina Gulia; Cristiano Cristini; Giorgio Fraietta; Lorenzo Marini; Pietro Grande; Vincenzo Gentile; Roberto Piergentili
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Lower cyclooxygenase-2 expression is associated with recurrence of solitary non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomislav Tadin; Kristian Krpina; Sanja Stifter; Emina Babarović; Zeljko Fučkar; Nives Jonjić
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.