Literature DB >> 21770977

The effect of marker location variability on noninvasive canine stifle kinematics.

Bryan T Torres1, Dana Whitlock, Lisa R Reynolds, Yang-Chieh Fu, Judith A Navik, Abbie L Speas, Andrew Sornborger, Steven C Budsberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of marker placement on kinematics of the canine stifle in 3 distinct hindlimb models. STUDY
DESIGN: In vivo biomechanical study. ANIMALS: Normal adult mixed-breed dogs (n=5).
METHODS: Ten retroreflective markers were affixed to the skin on the right rear leg of each dog to establish normal stifle kinematics. Four additional markers were placed around the greater trochanter (GT), 2 m cranial, caudal, dorsal, and ventral to evaluate single marker placement variability on kinematic model data. Dogs were walked and trotted 5 times through the calibrated space. Sagittal flexion and extension angle waveforms were acquired during each trial with 3 models that were produced simultaneously during each gait. The GT marker was reassigned to 1 of the 4 additional locations (cranial, caudal, dorsal, and ventral) to alter the kinematic model. Comparison of sagittal flexion and extension angle waveforms was performed with Generalized Indicator Function Analysis.
RESULTS: Each model provided consistent equivalent sagittal flexion-extension data. Analysis revealed statistically significant differences between all GT locations. The differences were greatest in the cranial and caudal locations for all models.
CONCLUSIONS: Deviation of the GT marker in the cranial/caudal direction from an anatomically normal position produces a greater degree of difference than deviation in a dorsal/ventral direction. © Copyright 2011 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21770977     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00852.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  4 in total

1.  Normal patellofemoral kinematic patterns during daily activities in dogs.

Authors:  Erica J Moore; Stanley E Kim; Scott A Banks; Antonio Pozzi; Jason D Coggeshall; Stephen C Jones
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Comparative kinematic gait analysis in young and old Beagle dogs.

Authors:  Malin Lorke; Maray Willen; Karin Lucas; Martin Beyerbach; Patrick Wefstaedt; Hugo Murua Escobar; Ingo Nolte
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 1.672

3.  Effect of Limb Position at the Time of Skin Marker Application on Sagittal Plane Kinematics of the Dog.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kim; Bryan T Torres; Gabriella S Sandberg; Steven C Budsberg
Journal:  Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 1.358

4.  Three-dimensional kinematics of canine hind limbs: in vivo, biplanar, high-frequency fluoroscopic analysis of four breeds during walking and trotting.

Authors:  Martin S Fischer; Silvia V Lehmann; Emanuel Andrada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.