Literature DB >> 21769966

Safety of gadolinium-based contrast material in sickle cell disease.

Jonathan R Dillman1, James H Ellis, Richard H Cohan, Elaine M Caoili, Hero K Hussain, Andrew D Campbell, Peter J Strouse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the safety of intravenously administered gadolinium-based contrast material in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All pediatric and adult SCD patients evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at our institution between January 1995 and July 2009 were identified. The medical records of SCD patients who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI as well as an equal-sized cohort of SCD patients who underwent unenhanced MRI were reviewed for adverse (vaso-occlusive and hemolytic) events within 1 week following imaging.
RESULTS: Eight (five mild and three moderate) adverse events were documented within 1 week following contrast-enhanced MRI (38 patients and 61 contrast injections), while six (five mild and one moderate) similar events occurred within 1 week following unenhanced MRI (61 patients and 61 unenhanced MRI examinations). This difference in the number of adverse events was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4, 5.2). No severe adverse event occurred in either patient cohort.
CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-based contrast materials do not appear to be associated with increased risk of vaso-occlusive or hemolytic adverse events when administered to SCD patients. Larger, prospective studies using multiple gadolinium-based contrast materials would be useful to confirm the results of our investigation.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21769966     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

Review 1.  Implementation of a comprehensive MR safety course for medical students.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet; Christina L Sammet
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Association between diffuse myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Omar Niss; Robert Fleck; Fowe Makue; Tarek Alsaied; Payal Desai; Jeffrey A Towbin; Punam Malik; Michael D Taylor; Charles T Quinn
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Neuroimaging findings in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  S C Thust; C Burke; A Siddiqui
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Utility of unenhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI in children with sickle cell disease -- can it differentiate bone infarcts from acute osteomyelitis?

Authors:  Jorge Delgado; Maria A Bedoya; Abby M Green; Diego Jaramillo; Victor Ho-Fung
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-25

5.  Size and density measurements of single sickle red blood cells using microfluidic magnetic levitation.

Authors:  Utku Goreke; Allison Bode; Sena Yaman; Umut A Gurkan; Naside Gozde Durmus
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 7.517

6.  Imaging Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Through MRI in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Zixuan Lin; Eboni Lance; Tiffany McIntyre; Yang Li; Peiying Liu; Chantelle Lim; Hongli Fan; Aylin Tekes; Alicia Cannon; James F Casella; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 5.119

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

Review 8.  Advantages and Limitations of Focal Liver Lesion Assessment with Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Comments on the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) Guidelines.

Authors:  Liliana Chiorean; Claudio Tana; Barbara Braden; Cosmin Caraiani; Zeno Sparchez; Xin-Wu Cui; Ulrich Baum; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.927

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.