Literature DB >> 2176888

Asymmetric structure of a three-arm DNA junction.

Q Guo1, M Lu, M E Churchill, T D Tullius, N R Kallenbach.   

Abstract

We present here experimental evidence that three-arm branched DNA molecules form an asymmetric structure in the presence of Mg2+. Electrophoretic mobility and chemical and enzymatic footprinting experiments on a three-arm branched DNA molecule formed from three 16-mer strands are described. The electrophoretic mobilities of three species of a three-arm junction in which pairs of arms are extended are found to differ in the presence of Mg2+: one combination of elongated arms migrates significantly faster than the other two. This effect is eliminated in the absence of Mg2+, leading us to suggest that the three-arm DNA junction forms an asymmetric structure due to preferential stacking of two of the arms at the junction in the presence of Mg2+. The pattern of self-protection of each 16-mer strand of the core complex exposed to Fe(II).EDTA and DNase I scission is unique, consistent with formation of an asymmetric structure in the presence of Mg2+. We conclude that three-arm junctions resemble four-arm junctions in showing preferential stacking effects at the branch site. Comparison of the scission patterns of linear duplexes and the branched trimer by the reactive probes methidiumpropyl-EDTA.Fe(II) [MPE.Fe(II)] and Cu(I)-[o-phenanthroline]2 [(OP)2CuI] further indicates that the branch point represents a site of enhanced binding for drugs, as it does in the four-arm case. Reaction with diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC), a purine-specific probe sensitive to conformation, is enhanced at the branch site, consistent with loosening of base pairing or unpairing at this point.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2176888     DOI: 10.1021/bi00501a010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  10 in total

1.  DNA binding by single HMG box model proteins.

Authors:  H Xin; S Taudte; N R Kallenbach; M P Limbach; R S Zitomer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Structure and dynamics of three-way DNA junctions: atomic force microscopy studies.

Authors:  L S Shlyakhtenko; V N Potaman; R R Sinden; A A Gall; Y L Lyubchenko
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Sequence-dependent folding of DNA three-way junctions.

Authors:  René Assenberg; Anthony Weston; Don L N Cardy; Keith R Fox
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Refinement of the solution structure of a branched DNA three-way junction.

Authors:  I V Ouporov; N B Leontis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Structures of bulged three-way DNA junctions.

Authors:  J B Welch; D R Duckett; D M Lilley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Interaction of three-way DNA junctions with steroids.

Authors:  T Kato; K Yano; K Ikebukuro; I Karube
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Long-distance radical cation reactions in DNA three-way junctions: inter-arm interaction and migration through the junction.

Authors:  U Santhosh; Gary B Schuster
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  In vitro effect of antisense oligonucleotides on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcription.

Authors:  B Bordier; C Hélène; P J Barr; S Litvak; L Sarih-Cottin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Recognition and cleavage of hairpin structures in nucleic acids by oligodeoxynucleotides.

Authors:  J C François; N T Thuong; C Hélène
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  From cisplatin to artificial nucleases--the role of metal ion-nucleic acid interactions in biology.

Authors:  B Lippert
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.949

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.