Literature DB >> 21768449

Dextromethorphan as a phenotyping test to predict endoxifen exposure in patients on tamoxifen treatment.

Anne-Joy M de Graan1, Sebastiaan F Teunissen, Filip Y F L de Vos, Walter J Loos, Ron H N van Schaik, Felix E de Jongh, Aad I de Vos, Robbert J van Alphen, Bronno van der Holt, Jaap Verweij, Caroline Seynaeve, Jos H Beijnen, Ron H J Mathijssen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tamoxifen, a widely used agent for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer, is mainly metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A to form its most abundant active metabolite, endoxifen. Interpatient variability in toxicity and efficacy of tamoxifen is substantial. Contradictory results on the value of CYP2D6 genotyping to reduce the variable efficacy have been reported. In this pharmacokinetic study, we investigated the value of dextromethorphan, a known probe drug for both CYP2D6 and CYP3A enzymatic activity, as a potential phenotyping probe for tamoxifen pharmacokinetics.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 40 women using tamoxifen for invasive breast cancer received a single dose of dextromethorphan 2 hours after tamoxifen intake. Dextromethorphan, tamoxifen, and their respective metabolites were quantified. Exposure parameters of all compounds were estimated, log transformed, and subsequently correlated.
RESULTS: A strong and highly significant correlation (r = -0.72; P < .001) was found between the exposures of dextromethorphan (0 to 6 hours) and endoxifen (0 to 24 hours). Also, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of dextromethorphan (0 to 6 hours) and daily trough endoxifen concentration was strongly correlated (r = -0.70; P < .001). In a single patient using the potent CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine, the low endoxifen concentration was accurately predicted by dextromethorphan exposure.
CONCLUSION: Dextromethorphan exposure after a single administration adequately predicted endoxifen exposure in individual patients with breast cancer taking tamoxifen. This test could contribute to the personalization and optimization of tamoxifen treatment, but it needs additional validation and simplification before being applicable in future dosing strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21768449     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.9839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

Review 1.  Addressing phenoconversion: the Achilles' heel of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah; Robert L Smith
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The effect of grape seed extract on the pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Andrew K L Goey; Irma Meijerman; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The Discriminatory Value of CYP2D6 Genotyping in Predicting the Dextromethorphan/Dextrorphan Phenotype in Women with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Trojan; Athanasios Vergopoulos; Urs Breitenstein; Burkhardt Seifert; Christoph Rageth; Wolfgang Joechle
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Exploiting Pharmacokinetic Models of Tamoxifen and Endoxifen to Identify Factors Causing Subtherapeutic Concentrations in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lena Klopp-Schulze; Markus Joerger; Sebastian G Wicha; Rob Ter Heine; Chantal Csajka; Zinnia P Parra-Guillen; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Evaluation of CYP2D6 enzyme activity using a 13C-dextromethorphan breath test in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen.

Authors:  Stephanie L Safgren; Vera J Suman; Matthew L Kosel; Judith A Gilbert; Sarah A Buhrow; John L Black; Donald W Northfelt; Anil S Modak; David Rosen; James N Ingle; Matthew M Ames; Joel M Reid; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Breath tests to phenotype drug disposition in oncology.

Authors:  Frans L Opdam; Anil S Modak; Hans Gelderblom; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen activity: understanding interstudy variability in methodological quality.

Authors:  M J Ratain; Y Nakamura; N J Cox
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Population pharmacokinetic modelling to assess the impact of CYP2D6 and CYP3A metabolic phenotypes on the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen and endoxifen.

Authors:  Rob ter Heine; Lisette Binkhorst; Anne Joy M de Graan; Peter de Bruijn; Jos H Beijnen; Ron H J Mathijssen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Functional polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and their impact on the therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rosane Vianna-Jorge; Juliana Simões Festa-Vasconcellos; Sheyla Maria Torres Goulart-Citrangulo; Marcelo Sobral Leite
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Augmentation of Endoxifen Exposure in Tamoxifen-Treated Women Following SSRI Switch.

Authors:  Lisette Binkhorst; Marjolein Bannink; Peter de Bruijn; Jan Ruit; Helga Droogendijk; Robbert J van Alphen; Tilly D den Boer; Mei Ho Lam; Agnes Jager; Teun van Gelder; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.