| Literature DB >> 21768053 |
Stéphanie Villar1, Emilie Le Roux-Goglin, Doriane A Gouas, Amelie Plymoth, Gilles Ferro, Mathieu Boniol, Myriam Lereau, Ebrima Bah, Andrew J Hall, Christopher P Wild, Maimuna Mendy, Helene Norder, Marianne van der Sande, Hilton Whittle, Marlin D Friesen, John D Groopman, Pierre Hainaut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and dietary aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) exposure are etiological factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in countries with hot, humid climates. HCC often harbors a TP53 (tumor protein p53) mutation at codon 249 (R249S). In chronic carriers, 1762T/1764A mutations in the HBV X gene are associated with increased HCC risk. Both mutations have been detected in circulating cell-free DNA (CFDNA) from asymptomatic HBV carriers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21768053 PMCID: PMC3226502 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Descriptive characteristics of participants in the study grouped by HBsAg status.
| Characteristic | HBsAg positive | HBsAg negative | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of subjects | 237 | 236 | ||
| Mean age (range), years | 31 (5–69) | 31 (5–70) | ||
| Sex [ | ||||
| Male | 109 (46) | 108 (46) | ||
| Female | 128 (54) | 128 (54) | ||
| Marker of viral replication [male/female, | ||||
| HBeAg positive | 17/10 (16/8) | — | ||
| HBeAg negative | 92/118 (84/92) | — | ||
| HBV vaccination [ | ||||
| Unknown | 2 (1) | — | ||
| Yes | 17 (7) | 104 (44) | ||
| No | 218 (92) | 132 (56) | ||
| Village [ | ||||
| Keneba | 89 (38) | 123 (52) | ||
| Manduar | 95 (40) | 66 (28) | ||
| Katong-Kunda | 41 (17) | 36 (15) | ||
| Other | 12 (5) | 11 (5) | ||
Subjects positive for serum R249S mutation by season [n/total (%)].
| Period | HBsAg negative | HBsAg positive | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October–July | 58/236 (25) | 106/237 (45) | 2.49 (1.68, 3.69) | |||
| October–March (higher AFB1 exposure) | 45/134 (34) | 43/134 (32) | 0.94 (0.56, 1.57) | |||
| April–July (lower AFB1 exposure) | 13/102 (13) | 63/103 (61) | 10.9 (5.35, 22.34) | |||
| ORs are adjusted for age and sex. | ||||||
Figure 1Box and whisker plots for the distribution of serum concentrations of TP53 R249S in HBsAg-negative (A) and -positive (B) subjects during higher and lower AFB1 exposure periods. Boxes extend from the 25th to the 75th percentile; horizontal lines within the boxes represent the median; whiskers extend 1.5 times the length of the interquartile range above and below the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; and diamonds represent outliers. Four outliers > 40,000 copies/mL serum are not represented: one in March for HBsAg-negative subjects, and one in April and two in June for HBsAg-positive subjects. The number of individuals sampled (2–51 subjects/month) and the distribution of HBsAg-positive subjects also positive for the 1762T/1764A double mutation are given.
Figure 2Serum concentrations (mean ± SD) of TP53 R249S in HBsAg-positive and ‑negative subjects, grouped by seasonal AFB1 exposure. *p < 0.001 compared with HBsAg-negative subjects with lower AFB1 exposure, and compared with HBsAg-positive subjects with higher AFB1 exposure, by Student’s t-test.
Subjects positive for serum R249S mutation by HBsAg status [n/total (%)].
| HBsAg | October–March | April–July | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | 45/134 (34) | 13/102 (13) | 0.30 (0.15, 0.61) | |||
| Positive | 43/134 (32) | 63/103 (61) | 3.59 (2.05, 6.30) | |||
| ORs are adjusted for age and sex. | ||||||
HBsAg-positive subjects positive for serum R249S mutation and/or 1762T/1764A double mutation [n (%)].
| 1762T/1764A mutation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Total | ||||
| No | 122 (51) | 9 (4) | 131 (55) | |||
| Yes | 96 (41) | 10 (4) | 106 (45) | |||
| Total | 218 (92) | 19 (8) | 237 (100) | |||
| For 1762T/1764A compared with | ||||||
Figure 3Seasonal variation of HBeAg positivity (HBeAg+) and HBV DNA negativity (HBV–) in HBsAg-positive subjects. The number of individuals sampled each month are given. The value for November 2002 was not considered because the sample size was too small.