Literature DB >> 21767755

Who will be sicker in the morning? Changes in the Simple Clinical Score the day after admission and the subsequent outcomes of acutely ill unselected medical patients.

John Kellett1, Andrew Emmanuel, Breda Deane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All doctors are haunted by the possibility that a patient they reassured yesterday will return seriously ill tomorrow. We examined changes in the Simple Clinical Score (SCS) the day after admission, factors that might influence these changes and the relationship of these changes to subsequent clinical outcome.
METHOD: The SCS was recorded in 1165 patients on admission and again the following day (i.e. 25.0±15.8 h later). The abilities of 51 variables that might predict changes in the SCS were examined.
RESULTS: The day after admission 16.1% of patients had been discharged home, 31.4% had decreased their SCS by 2.4±1.6 points, 38.6% had an unchanged SCS, 12.0% had increased their SCS by 2.1±1.7 points and 1.2% had died. Patients with an increased SCS had higher in-hospital mortality (10% vs. 1.1%, OR 10.1, p<.001) and a longer length of stay (9.4±9.6 vs. 5.6±7.0 days, p<.001). There was no consistent association between the SCS recorded at admission and SCS increase. Only nursing home residence, heart failure and a Medical Admission Risk System laboratory data score>0.09 were found to be independent predictors of SCS increase.
CONCLUSION: The SCS of 12% of patients increases the day after admission to hospital, which is associated with a ten-fold increase of in-hospital mortality. Low SCS risk patients are just as likely to have a SCS increase as high risk patients.
Copyright © 2011 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767755     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Intern Med        ISSN: 0953-6205            Impact factor:   4.487


  4 in total

1.  Prognosis and risk factors for deterioration in patients admitted to a medical emergency department.

Authors:  Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen; Mikkel Brabrand; Annmarie Touborg Lassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Can vital signs recorded in patients' homes aid decision making in emergency care? A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Hamza; Jelmer Alsma; John Kellett; Mikkel Brabrand; Erika F Christensen; Tim Cooksley; Harm R Haak; Prabath W B Nanayakkara; Hanneke Merten; Bo Schouten; Immo Weichert; Christian P Subbe
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-04-10

3.  Factors related to monitoring during admission of acute patients.

Authors:  Thomas Schmidt; Camilla N Bech; Mikkel Brabrand; Uffe Kock Wiil; Annmarie Lassen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review.

Authors:  Idar Johan Brekke; Lars Håland Puntervoll; Peter Bank Pedersen; John Kellett; Mikkel Brabrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.