Literature DB >> 21767621

Needle-free and microneedle drug delivery in children: a case for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

Utpal U Shah1, Matthew Roberts, Mine Orlu Gul, Catherine Tuleu, Michael W Beresford.   

Abstract

Parenteral routes of drug administration have poor acceptability and tolerability in children. Advances in transdermal drug delivery provide a potential alternative for improving drug administration in this patient group. Issues with parenteral delivery in children are highlighted and thus illustrate the scope for the application of needle-free and microneedle technologies. This mini-review discusses the opportunities and challenges for providing disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) currently prescribed to paediatric rheumatology patients using such technologies. The aim is to raise further awareness of the need for age-appropriate formulations and drug delivery systems and stimulate exploration of these options for DMARDs, and in particular, rapidly emerging biologics on the market. The ability of needle-free and microneedle technologies to deliver monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins still remains largely untested. Such an understanding is crucial for future drug design opportunities. The bioavailability, safety and tolerance of delivering biologics into the viable epidermis also need to be studied.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767621     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  8 in total

Review 1.  Formulations for children: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Hannah K Batchelor; John F Marriott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Development of vertical SU-8 microneedles for transdermal drug delivery by double drawing lithography technology.

Authors:  Zhuolin Xiang; Hao Wang; Aakanksha Pant; Giorgia Pastorin; Chengkuo Lee
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Assessment of mechanical stability of rapidly separating microneedles for transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Meng Chan He; Bo Zhi Chen; Mohammad Ashfaq; Xin Dong Guo
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 4.  Microneedle-mediated vaccine delivery: harnessing cutaneous immunobiology to improve efficacy.

Authors:  Sharifa Al-Zahrani; Marija Zaric; Cian McCrudden; Chris Scott; Adrien Kissenpfennig; Ryan F Donnelly
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.648

5.  Polymer-based disposable microneedle array with insertion assisted by vibrating motion.

Authors:  F-W Lee; W-H Hung; C-W Ma; Y-J Yang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Yeu-Chun Kim; Jung-Hwan Park; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Development of an internationally agreed minimal dataset for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) for clinical and research use.

Authors:  Liza J McCann; Jamie J Kirkham; Lucy R Wedderburn; Clarissa Pilkington; Adam M Huber; Angelo Ravelli; Duncan Appelbe; Paula R Williamson; Michael W Beresford
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Towards a versatile point-of-care system combining femtosecond laser generated microfluidic channels and direct laser written microneedle arrays.

Authors:  Anika Trautmann; Gian-Luca Roth; Benedikt Nujiqi; Thomas Walther; Ralf Hellmann
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 7.127

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.