| Literature DB >> 21767354 |
Gerhard Dobler1, Martin Pfeffer.
Abstract
Historically, flea-borne diseases are among the most important medical diseases of humans. Plague and murine typhus are known for centuries while the last years brought some new flea-transmitted pathogens, like R. felis and Bartonella henselae. Dogs may play an essential or an accidental role in the natural transmission cycle of flea-borne pathogens. They support the growth of some of the pathogens or they serve as transport vehicles for infected fleas between their natural reservoirs and humans. More than 15 different flea species have been described in domestic dogs thus far. Several other species have been found to be associated with wild canids. Fleas found on dogs originate from rodents, birds, insectivores and from other Carnivora. Dogs therefore may serve as ideal bridging hosts for the introduction of flea-borne diseases from nature to home. In addition to their role as ectoparasites they cause nuisance for humans and animals and may be the cause for severe allergic reactions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21767354 PMCID: PMC3160944 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Schematic Life cycle of .
Prevalence of flea infestation in dog populations of various countries (according to different references) (A.: Archaeopsylla; C.: Ctenocephalides; Ca.: Cediopsylla; Cr.: Ceratopsyllus; Ct.: Ceratophyllus; E.: Echidnophaga; M.: Megabothris; P.: Pulex; Pa. Paraceras; R.: Rhopalopsyllus; T.: Tunga; X.: Xenopsylla; n.d. no data provided)
| Country | No. of dogs tested | Infestation rate (% of tested dogs carrying fleas) | Flea species detected | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albania | 181 | 76% | [ | |
| 5% | ||||
| 8% | ||||
| Argentina | 116 | 98% | [ | |
| Australia | 116 | 85% | [ | |
| 6% | ||||
| 13% | ||||
| Austria | 129 | 81% | [ | |
| 19% | ||||
| 7% | ||||
| Brazil | 61 | 69% | [ | |
| Brazil | 101 | 64% | [ | |
| 2% | ||||
| 2% | ||||
| Brazil | 41 | 44% | [ | |
| Brazil | 46 | 39% | [ | |
| 17% | ||||
| Chile | 3000 | 42% | [ | |
| 39% | ||||
| 19% | ||||
| Denmark | 140 | 54% | [ | |
| 42% | ||||
| France | 392 | 89% | [ | |
| 10% | ||||
| 1.3% | ||||
| 0.8% | ||||
| Germany | 1922 | 4% | [ | |
| 0,9% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| Germany | 48 | 46% | [ | |
| 44% | ||||
| 19% | ||||
| 10% | ||||
| Germany | 163 | 28% | [ | |
| 14% | ||||
| 58% | ||||
| Greece | 129 | 71% | [ | |
| 40% | ||||
| 1% | ||||
| 1% | ||||
| Hungary | 2267 | 8% | [ | |
| 6% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| Iran | 756 | 8% | [ | |
| 1% | ||||
| 0,9% | ||||
| 0,5% | ||||
| 0,3% | ||||
| Ireland | 103 | 75% | [ | |
| 18% | ||||
| 4% | ||||
| 2% | ||||
| Italy | 1376 | 16% | [ | |
| 2% | ||||
| Korea, Republic of | 103 | 75 | [ | |
| Laos | 3 | n.d. | [ | |
| n.d. | ||||
| n.d. | ||||
| Mexico | 1803 | 25% | [ | |
| 5% | ||||
| New Caledonia | 8 | 100% | [ | |
| Nigeria | 396 | 33% | [ | |
| 7% | ||||
| 0,5% | ||||
| Pakistan | n.d. | 34% | [ | |
| Poland | 50 | 100% | [ | |
| Spain | 109 | 100% | [ | |
| 87 | 71% | [ | ||
| 13% | ||||
| 16% | ||||
| Spain | 744 | 95% | [ | |
| 10% | ||||
| 1% | ||||
| 0,1% | ||||
| United Kingdom | 60 | 78% | [ | |
| 20% | ||||
| 2% | ||||
| United Kingdom | 2653 | 12% | [ | |
| < 0,1% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| < 0,1% | ||||
| USA | 11 | 61% | [ | |
| 21% | ||||
| USA | 100 | 8% | [ | |
Available data on the prevalence rates of flea infestation in different species of the family Canidae in different countries (A.: Archaepsylla; C.: Ctenocephalides; Ce.: Cediopsylla; Ch.: Chaetopsylla; D.: Dactylopsyllus; E.: Euhoplopsyllus; O.: Oropsylla; Or.: Orchopeas; P.: Pulex; Pa.: Paraceras; R.: Rhopalopsyllus; X. Xenopsylla).
| Canid species | Country | Flea prevalence | Flea species detected | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 10-30% | [ | ||
| 3-13% | ||||
| 0.5-20% | ||||
| 1-2% | ||||
| 1-7% | ||||
| Spain | 100% | [ | ||
| Hungary | 43% | [ | ||
| 37% | ||||
| 12% | ||||
| 4% | ||||
| 11% | ||||
| 3% | ||||
| U.S.A. | 100% | [ | ||
| 92% | ||||
| 3% | ||||
| <1% | ||||
| <1% | ||||
| <1% | ||||
| U.S.A. | 38% | [ | ||
| <1% | ||||
| <1% | ||||
| <1% | ||||
| <1% | ||||
| U.S.A. | 98% | [ | ||
| Brazil | 89% | [ | ||
| 7% | ||||
| 2% | ||||
| 1% | ||||
| 2% | ||||
| Bolivia | 0% | [ | ||
| Bolivia | n.d. | [ | ||
Detection of Bartonella spp. in fleas collected from dogs from different countries (A. Archaeopsylla; C.: Ctenocephalides; Ce.: Ceratopsyllus)
| Country | Dogs tested | Flea species tested for Bartonella | No of fleas tested | No of fleas positive for Bartonella (B.) species: | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| France | 84 | 317 | [ | ||
| Germany | 49 | 114 | [ | ||
| 4 | |||||
| 26 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| Laos | 3 | 23 | [ | ||
| Lebanon | 2 | 50 | [ | ||
| New Caledonia | 8 | 20 | [ | ||
| United Kingdom | 31 | 280 | [ | ||