Literature DB >> 21767166

Radiographic and clinical factors associated with improved outcomes in advanced cancer patients with bowel obstruction.

Brian D Badgwell1, Carlo Contreras, Robert Askew, Robert Krouse, Barry Feig, Janice N Cormier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative clinical and radiographic factors relevant to treatment selection and outcomes in patients with advanced cancer presenting with bowel obstruction.
METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data were retrospectively obtained from records of inpatients with suspected bowel obstruction referred for palliative surgical consultation (2000-2006). Patients were stratified according to site of obstruction: gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), small bowel obstruction (SBO), and large bowel obstruction (LBO). We utilized the Cox proportional hazards model to identify preoperative clinical and radiologic variables associated with overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Of 191 patients, the site of obstruction was classified as GOO in 41 (21%), SBO in 122 (64%), and LBO in 28 (15%). Almost half of the patients (47%) had received systemic therapy in the 6 weeks prior to evaluation. The most common sites of disease identified on imaging included abdominal visceral metastases (37%), carcinomatosis/sarcomatosis (46%), and an intact primary tumor or recurrence (31%). Most patients (62%) exhibited 2 or more sites of disease on imaging. Treatment strategies included nonoperative/nonprocedural management in 41% (n = 79), endoscopic/interventional radiology procedures in 25% (n = 48), and surgery in 34% (n = 64). Median OS for the cohort was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-4.6). Median OS for GOO, SBO, and LBO was 2.7 (95% CI: 1.7-4.1), 3.5 (95% CI: 2.5-4.9), and 7.0 (95% CI: 2.1-11) months, respectively (p = 0.17). Adverse prognostic factors for OS included endoscopic/interventional radiology procedures and ≥3 radiologically evident sites of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: OS, although low, was not significantly different among GOO, SBO, and LBO. Single sites of disease identified on imaging were not associated with OS, although multiple sites of disease were associated with diminished OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767166     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  3 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for the resolution of symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Sarah E Cousins; Emma Tempest; David J Feuer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-04

2.  Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Costs for Bowel Obstruction in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Lois M Ramondetta; Brian D Badgwell; Diane C Bodurka; Karen H Lu; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Malignant Bowel Obstruction Management Over Time: Are We Doing Anything New? A Current Narrative Review.

Authors:  Farhana Shariff; Jessica Bogach; Keegan Guidolin; Ashlie Nadler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.