Literature DB >> 21767031

The financial consequences of too many men: sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending.

Vladas Griskevicius1, Joshua M Tybur, Joshua M Ackerman, Andrew W Delton, Theresa E Robertson, Andrew E White.   

Abstract

The ratio of males to females in a population is an important factor in determining behavior in animals. We propose that sex ratio also has pervasive effects in humans, such as by influencing economic decisions. Using both historical data and experiments, we examined how sex ratio influences saving, borrowing, and spending in the United States. Findings show that male-biased sex ratios (an abundance of men) lead men to discount the future and desire immediate rewards. Male-biased sex ratios decreased men's desire to save for the future and increased their willingness to incur debt for immediate expenditures. Sex ratio appears to influence behavior by increasing the intensity of same-sex competition for mates. Accordingly, a scarcity of women led people to expect men to spend more money during courtship, such as by paying more for engagement rings. These findings demonstrate experimentally that sex ratio influences human decision making in ways consistent with evolutionary biological theory. Implications for sex ratio effects across cultures are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767031      PMCID: PMC3302970          DOI: 10.1037/a0024761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  42 in total

1.  Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish.

Authors:  Elisabet Forsgren; Trond Amundsen; Asa A Borg; Jens Bjelvenmark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system.

Authors:  Jill M Sundie; Douglas T Kenrick; Vladas Griskevicius; Joshua M Tybur; Kathleen D Vohs; Daniel J Beal
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-04

3.  Functional projection: how fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception.

Authors:  Jon K Maner; Douglas T Kenrick; D Vaughn Becker; Theresa E Robertson; Brian Hofer; Steven L Neuberg; Andrew W Delton; Jonathan Butner; Mark Schaller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-01

Review 4.  Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built Upon Ancient Foundations.

Authors:  Douglas T Kenrick; Vladas Griskevicius; Steven L Neuberg; Mark Schaller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-05

5.  They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): from out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity.

Authors:  Joshua M Ackerman; Jenessa R Shapiro; Steven L Neuberg; Douglas T Kenrick; D Vaughn Becker; Vladas Griskevicius; Jon K Maner; Mark Schaller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-10

6.  Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: an integrated life history approach.

Authors:  Bruce J Ellis
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?

Authors:  Margo Wilson; Martin Daly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Cooperative courtship: helping friends raise and raze relationship barriers.

Authors:  Joshua M Ackerman; Douglas T Kenrick
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-05-19

10.  Missing girls in India: infanticide, feticide and made-to-order pregnancies? Insights from hospital-based sex-ratio-at-birth over the last century.

Authors:  Mohit Sahni; Neeraj Verma; D Narula; Raji Mathew Varghese; V Sreenivas; Jacob M Puliyel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  Sex, mutations and marketing. How the Cambrian explosion set the stage for runaway consumerism.

Authors:  Geoffrey Miller
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Sex-biased survival predicts adult sex ratio variation in wild birds.

Authors:  Tamás Székely; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Claudia Fichtel; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Operational Sex Ratio Predicts Binge Drinking Across U.S. Counties.

Authors:  Toe Aung; Susan M Hughes; Liana S E Hone; David A Puts
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Estimating adult sex ratios in nature.

Authors:  Sergio Ancona; Francisco V Dénes; Oliver Krüger; Tamás Székely; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The impact of sex ratio and economic status on local birth rates.

Authors:  A Chipman; E Morrison
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  The potential pitfalls of studying adult sex ratios at aggregate levels in humans.

Authors:  Thomas V Pollet; Andrea H Stoevenbelt; Toon Kuppens
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Exposure to childhood traumas ups the odds of giving birth to daughters.

Authors:  Marsha Kaitz; Ann Marie Rokem; David Mankuta; Maayan Davidov; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility.

Authors:  Niels E Skakkebaek; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Germaine M Buck Louis; Jorma Toppari; Anna-Maria Andersson; Michael L Eisenberg; Tina Kold Jensen; Niels Jørgensen; Shanna H Swan; Katherine J Sapra; Søren Ziebe; Lærke Priskorn; Anders Juul
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 9.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-06

10.  Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios.

Authors:  Kathryn V Walter; Daniel Conroy-Beam; David M Buss; Kelly Asao; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Piotr Sorokowski; Toivo Aavik; Grace Akello; Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba; Charlotte Alm; Naumana Amjad; Afifa Anjum; Chiemezie S Atama; Derya Atamtürk Duyar; Richard Ayebare; Carlota Batres; Mons Bendixen; Aicha Bensafia; Boris Bizumic; Mahmoud Boussena; Marina Butovskaya; Seda Can; Katarzyna Cantarero; Antonin Carrier; Hakan Cetinkaya; Ilona Croy; Rosa María Cueto; Marcin Czub; Daria Dronova; Seda Dural; Izzet Duyar; Berna Ertugrul; Agustín Espinosa; Ignacio Estevan; Carla Sofia Esteves; Luxi Fang; Tomasz Frackowiak; Jorge Contreras Garduño; Karina Ugalde González; Farida Guemaz; Petra Gyuris; Mária Halamová; Iskra Herak; Marina Horvat; Ivana Hromatko; Chin-Ming Hui; Jas Laile Jaafar; Feng Jiang; Konstantinos Kafetsios; Tina Kavčič; Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair; Nicolas Kervyn; Truong Thi Khanh Ha; Imran Ahmed Khilji; Nils C Köbis; Hoang Moc Lan; András Láng; Georgina R Lennard; Ernesto León; Torun Lindholm; Trinh Thi Linh; Giulia Lopez; Nguyen Van Luot; Alvaro Mailhos; Zoi Manesi; Rocio Martinez; Sarah L McKerchar; Norbert Meskó; Girishwar Misra; Conal Monaghan; Emanuel C Mora; Alba Moya-Garófano; Bojan Musil; Jean Carlos Natividade; Agnieszka Niemczyk; George Nizharadze; Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee; Ike E Onyishi; Baris Özener; Ariela Francesca Pagani; Vilmante Pakalniskiene; Miriam Parise; Farid Pazhoohi; Annette Pisanski; Katarzyna Pisanski; Edna Ponciano; Camelia Popa; Pavol Prokop; Muhammad Rizwan; Mario Sainz; Svjetlana Salkičević; Ruta Sargautyte; Ivan Sarmány-Schuller; Susanne Schmehl; Shivantika Sharad; Razi Sultan Siddiqui; Franco Simonetti; Stanislava Yordanova Stoyanova; Meri Tadinac; Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Christin-Melanie Vauclair; Luis Diego Vega; Dwi Ajeng Widarini; Gyesook Yoo; Marta Marta Zaťková; Maja Zupančič
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.