Literature DB >> 21767026

Rewards of bridging the divide between measurement and clinical theory: demonstration of a bifactor model for the Brief Symptom Inventory.

Michael L Thomas1.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence that psychiatric disorders maintain hierarchical associations where general and domain-specific factors play prominent roles (see D. Watson, 2005). Standard, unidimensional measurement models can fail to capture the meaningful nuances of such complex latent variable structures. The present study examined the ability of the multidimensional item response theory bifactor model (see R. D. Gibbons & D. R. Hedeker, 1992) to improve construct validity by serving as a bridge between measurement and clinical theories. Archival data consisting of 688 outpatients' psychiatric diagnoses and item-level responses to the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI; L. R. Derogatis, 1993) were extracted from files at a university mental health clinic. The bifactor model demonstrated superior fit for the internal structure of the BSI and improved overall diagnostic accuracy in the sample (73%) compared with unidimensional (61%) and oblique simple structure (65%) models. Consistent with clinical theory, multiple sources of item variance were drawn from individual test items. Test developers and clinical researchers are encouraged to consider model-based measurement in the assessment of psychiatric distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767026     DOI: 10.1037/a0024712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  14 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in a heterogeneous sample of substance users.

Authors:  Kelly Serafini; Bo Malin-Mayor; Charla Nich; Karen Hunkele; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 2.  Transdiagnostic factors of psychopathology and substance use disorders: a review.

Authors:  Nicholas R Eaton; Craig Rodriguez-Seijas; Natacha Carragher; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Deconstructing racial differences: the effects of quality of education and cerebrovascular risk factors.

Authors:  Janessa O Carvalho; Doug Tommet; Paul K Crane; Michael L Thomas; Amy Claxton; Christian Habeck; Jennifer J Manly; Heather R Romero
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11: reassessment of its structure in a community sample.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Tyler M Moore; Fred W Sabb; Amira K Brown; Edythe D London
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2013-04-01

5.  Advances in applications of item response theory to clinical assessment.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-03-14

6.  Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.

Authors:  Steven P Reise
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Modeling the Structure of Acute Sport-Related Concussion Symptoms: A Bifactor Approach.

Authors:  Lindsay D Nelson; Mark D Kramer; Christopher J Patrick; Michael A McCrea
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Testing models of psychopathology in preschool-aged children using a structured interview-based assessment.

Authors:  Thomas M Olino; Lea R Dougherty; Sara J Bufferd; Gabrielle A Carlson; Daniel N Klein
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2014-10

9.  The coexistence of coping resources and specific coping styles in stress: evidence from full information item bifactor analysis.

Authors:  Jiaxi Zhang; Meng Cui; Wei Wang; Huijie Lu; Qing Wu; Xia Zhu; Danmin Miao; Yan Zhang; Xi Feng; Wei Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  General distress, hopelessness-suicidal ideation and worrying in adolescence: concurrent and predictive validity of a symptom-level bifactor model for clinical diagnoses.

Authors:  J Brodbeck; I M Goodyer; R A Abbott; V J Dunn; M C St Clair; M Owens; P B Jones; T J Croudace
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.