Literature DB >> 21766910

Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients' perspectives in health policy design and decision making.

Helle Ploug Hansen1, Eva Draborg, Finn Børlum Kristensen.   

Abstract

Health systems are placing more and more emphasis on the design and delivery of services that are focused on the patient, and there is a growing interest in patient involvement in health policy research and health technology assessment (HTA). Furthermore, there is a growing research interest in eliciting patients' views, not only on 'what works' for patients but also on the need for intervention and on factors influencing the implementation of particular health technologies, their appropriateness and acceptability. This article focuses on qualitative research synthesis in eliciting patients' perspectives. Its aim is to bring research closer to policy development and decision making, to facilitate better use of research findings for health and welfare, to generate a body of evidence, and to ensure that effective and appropriate information is used in health policy decision design. A variety of synthesizing approaches in qualitative research are explored, such as meta-synthesis, meta-summary, meta-ethnography, and meta-study, focusing especially on methodology. Meta-synthesis and meta-ethnography are probably the most frequently cited approaches in qualitative research synthesis and have perhaps the most developed methodology. The implications of these various synthesizing approaches in relation to health policy and HTA are discussed, and we suggest that meta-synthesis and meta-summary are particularly useful approaches. They have an explicit focus on 'evidence synthesis', fairly clear methodologies, and they are designed to not only present interpretations of the findings but also integrate research findings. Qualitative research synthesis enables researchers to synthesize findings from multiple qualitative studies on patients' perspectives instead of establishing new, expensive, and perhaps redundant studies that might intrude on the lives of patients. Qualitative research synthesis is highly recommended by decision makers and in health policy research and HTA. In cases where patient assessment is important to overall success, it can provide those responsible for policy and decision making with a broad and varied range of knowledge about patients' perspectives before they make decisions on the application of health technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21766910     DOI: 10.2165/11539880-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  26 in total

1.  Chronic illness experience: insights from a metastudy.

Authors:  Sally Thorne; Barbara Paterson; Sonia Acorn; Connie Canam; Gloria Joachim; Carol Jillings
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2002-04

2.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The role of the patient in promoting patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Michael J Klag; Ellen J Mackenzie; Christopher I Carswell; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Shona Agarwal; David Jones; Bridget Young; Alex Sutton
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2005-01

5.  International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment.

Authors:  Eva Draborg; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Peter Bo Poulsen; Mogens Horder
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  Time-trends in health technology assessments: an analysis of developments in composition of international health technology assessments from 1989 to 2002.

Authors:  Eva Draborg; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Use of research to inform public policymaking.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Francisco Becerra Posada; Andy Haines; Eric Osei
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 30-Nov 5       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts.

Authors:  Lela Zimmer
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Organizational and patient-related assessments in HTAs: state of the art.

Authors:  Anne Lee; Line Sinding Skött; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt.

Authors:  Salla Atkins; Simon Lewin; Helen Smith; Mark Engel; Atle Fretheim; Jimmy Volmink
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Involvement of patients with lung and gynecological cancer and their relatives in psychosocial cancer rehabilitation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Bente Hoeck; Loni Ledderer; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Qualitative approaches to understanding patient preferences.

Authors:  Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.

Authors:  Lill-Brith von Arx; Trine Kjeer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - an agile lifelong behaviour: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Emma Swärdh; Christina Opava; Nina Brodin
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-05

5.  The Experience of people with rheumatoid arthritis living with fatigue: a qualitative metasynthesis.

Authors:  Jette Primdahl; Annette Hegelund; Annette Gøntha Lorenzen; Katrine Loeppenthin; Emma Dures; Bente Appel Esbensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases.

Authors:  Emma F France; Isabelle Uny; Nicola Ring; Ruth L Turley; Margaret Maxwell; Edward A S Duncan; Ruth G Jepson; Rachel J Roberts; Jane Noyes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  A meta-ethnography and theory of parental ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sara A Rosenthal; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2013-06-17

8.  Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Stacy M Carter; Patti Shih; Jane Williams; Chris Degeling; Julie Mooney-Somers
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Gladys N Honein-Abouhaidar; Monika Kastner; Vincent Vuong; Laure Perrier; Linda Rabeneck; Jill Tinmouth; Sharon Straus; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  How to Improve Integrated Care for People with Chronic Conditions: Key Findings from EU FP-7 Project INTEGRATE and Beyond.

Authors:  Liesbeth Borgermans; Yannick Marchal; Loraine Busetto; Jorid Kalseth; Frida Kasteng; Kadri Suija; Marje Oona; Olena Tigova; Magda Rösenmuller; Dirk Devroey
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.120

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.