Literature DB >> 21766300

Spleen deflation and beyond: the pros and cons of Janus kinase 2 inhibitor therapy for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Alfonso Quintás-Cardama1, Srdan Verstovsek.   

Abstract

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (MF) are malignancies that frequently harbor the recurrent somatic point mutation JAK2(V617F). The discovery of this mutation has fueled the development of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors. Available results have indicated that JAK2 inhibitors are particularly effective at reducing spleen size. However, the activity of these agents is multifaceted and also involves a marked improvement of systemic symptoms and, for those agents with dual JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitory activity, a marked reduction in the levels of circulating cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Because JAK2 inhibitors are not specific for JAK2(V617F), responses have also been observed in JAK2(V617F) -negative MPNs because of the inhibition of wild-type JAK2, which is also likely responsible for the induction of cytopenias in patients with MF and for the normalization of peripheral blood counts observed in patients with ET or PV. Given the distinct mortality and morbidity associated with ET, PV, and MF, the use of JAK2 inhibitors appears reasonable for patients with MF as well as for those with ET or PV who have become resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea. Ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials will further delineate the role of these agents in the management of patients with MPNs. The pros and cons of JAK2 kinase inhibitor therapy are herein discussed.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21766300     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

1.  Therapy with the histone deacetylase inhibitor pracinostat for patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Hagop Kantarjian; Zeev Estrov; Gautam Borthakur; Jorge Cortes; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  Long-term outcomes of 107 patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib: survival advantage in comparison to matched historical controls.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Hagop M Kantarjian; Zeev Estrov; Jorge E Cortes; Deborah A Thomas; Tapan Kadia; Sherry Pierce; Elias Jabbour; Gautham Borthakur; Elisa Rumi; Ester Pungolino; Enrica Morra; Domenica Caramazza; Mario Cazzola; Francesco Passamonti
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Biology and clinical management of myeloproliferative neoplasms and development of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib.

Authors:  J Mascarenhas; T I Mughal; S Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Receiving Treatment with Ruxolitinib.

Authors:  Keith L Davis; Isabelle Côté; James A Kaye; Estella Mendelson; Haitao Gao; Julian Perez Ronco
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-11-09

5.  Combination of PIM and JAK2 inhibitors synergistically suppresses MPN cell proliferation and overcomes drug resistance.

Authors:  Shih-Min A Huang; Anlai Wang; Rita Greco; Zhifang Li; Claude Barberis; Michel Tabart; Vinod Patel; Laurent Schio; Raelene Hurley; Bo Chen; Hong Cheng; Christoph Lengauer; Jack Pollard; James Watters; Carlos Garcia-Echeverria; Dmitri Wiederschain; Francisco Adrian; JingXin Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-05-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.