BACKGROUND: The detection of a small number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is important, especially in the early stages of cancer. Small numbers of CTCs are hard to detect, because very few approaches are sensitive enough to differentiate these from the pool of other cells. Improving the affinity of a selective, surface-functionalized molecule is important given the scarcity of CTCs in vivo. There are several proteins and aptamers that provide such high affinity; however, using surface nanotexturing increases this affinity even further. METHODS: The authors report an approach to improve the affinity of tumor cell capture by using novel aptamers against cell membrane overexpressed epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) on a nanotextured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate. Surface-immobilized aptamers were used to specifically capture tumor cells from physiologic samples. RESULTS: The nanotexturing of PDMS increased surface roughness at the nanoscale. This increased the effective surface area and resulted in a significantly higher degree of surface functionalization. The phenomenon resulted in increased density of immobilized EGFR-specific RNA aptamer molecules and provided significantly higher efficiency to capture cancer cells from a mixture. The data indicated that CTCs could be captured and enriched, leading to higher yield yet higher background. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison between glass slides, plain PDMS, and nanotextured PDMS functionalized with aptamers demonstrated that a 2-fold approach of using aptamers on nanotextured PDMS can be important for cancer cytology devices, and especially for the idea of a "lab-on-chip," toward higher yield in capture efficiency.
BACKGROUND: The detection of a small number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is important, especially in the early stages of cancer. Small numbers of CTCs are hard to detect, because very few approaches are sensitive enough to differentiate these from the pool of other cells. Improving the affinity of a selective, surface-functionalized molecule is important given the scarcity of CTCs in vivo. There are several proteins and aptamers that provide such high affinity; however, using surface nanotexturing increases this affinity even further. METHODS: The authors report an approach to improve the affinity of tumor cell capture by using novel aptamers against cell membrane overexpressed epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) on a nanotextured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate. Surface-immobilized aptamers were used to specifically capture tumor cells from physiologic samples. RESULTS: The nanotexturing of PDMS increased surface roughness at the nanoscale. This increased the effective surface area and resulted in a significantly higher degree of surface functionalization. The phenomenon resulted in increased density of immobilized EGFR-specific RNA aptamer molecules and provided significantly higher efficiency to capture cancer cells from a mixture. The data indicated that CTCs could be captured and enriched, leading to higher yield yet higher background. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison between glass slides, plain PDMS, and nanotextured PDMS functionalized with aptamers demonstrated that a 2-fold approach of using aptamers on nanotextured PDMS can be important for cancer cytology devices, and especially for the idea of a "lab-on-chip," toward higher yield in capture efficiency.
Authors: Punit Kohli; C Chad Harrell; Zehui Cao; Rahela Gasparac; Weihong Tan; Charles R Martin Journal: Science Date: 2004-08-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: M P MacDonald; S Neale; L Paterson; A Richies; K Dholakia; G C Spalding Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2004 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: Omid C Farokhzad; Sangyong Jon; Ali Khademhosseini; Thanh-Nga T Tran; David A Lavan; Robert Langer Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Manuel Fuentes; Cesar Mateo; Lucia García; Juan C Tercero; José M Guisán; Roberto Fernández-Lafuente Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: André A Adams; Paul I Okagbare; Juan Feng; Matuesz L Hupert; Don Patterson; Jost Göttert; Robin L McCarley; Dimitris Nikitopoulos; Michael C Murphy; Steven A Soper Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Ramanathan Vaidyanathan; Shuvashis Dey; Laura G Carrascosa; Muhammad J A Shiddiky; Matt Trau Journal: Biomicrofluidics Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 2.800
Authors: Mohammed Arif I Mahmood; Mohammad Raziul Hasan; Umair J M Khan; Peter B Allen; Young-Tae Kim; Andrew D Ellington; Samir M Iqbal Journal: Technology (Singap World Sci) Date: 2015-11-16
Authors: Myoung-Hwan Park; Eduardo Reátegui; Wei Li; Shannon N Tessier; Keith H K Wong; Anne E Jensen; Vishal Thapar; David Ting; Mehmet Toner; Shannon L Stott; Paula T Hammond Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 15.419