INTRODUCTION: The temporal patterns of onset of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences leading to established persistent AF is currently unknown. METHODS: Three hundred thirty patients with a history of paroxysmal AF and bradycardia (mean age, 70 ± 10 years; 61% male) with implanted pacemakers that automatically recorded the cumulative daily atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) burden were included in the analysis. Persistent AF was defined as device data showing ≥7 consecutive days with ≥23 h of AT. We analyzed the pattern and duration of persistent AF recurrences and time to each persistent AF episode recurrence. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (24%) developed their first persistent AT/AF after 147 ± 149 days. Follow up ranged from 14 to 499 days. Median AF burden in the week prior to persistent AF was 3.5 h/day. Fifty-four patients (16%) had a minimum of 180 days follow up after initial detection of persistent AF. Three of 54 patients (6%) immediately developed established AF; 32 of 51 patients (63%) returned to sinus rhythm but then had a second persistent AF event. These 32 patients had a minimum of 90 days follow up and 25 of these 32 patients (78 %) had a third persistent AF event. Time to recurrence analysis showed progressive abbreviation in persistent AF onset. The median durations of the first, second, and third persistent AF events were 16, 13, and 17 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The time to first, second, and third persistent AF recurrences progressively decreases with a high likelihood of established persistent AF within 9 months of onset. (2) These data support intermittent but frequent AF monitoring for the detection of persistent AF recurrences to assess the efficacy of rhythm control interventions.
INTRODUCTION: The temporal patterns of onset of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences leading to established persistent AF is currently unknown. METHODS: Three hundred thirty patients with a history of paroxysmal AF and bradycardia (mean age, 70 ± 10 years; 61% male) with implanted pacemakers that automatically recorded the cumulative daily atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) burden were included in the analysis. Persistent AF was defined as device data showing ≥7 consecutive days with ≥23 h of AT. We analyzed the pattern and duration of persistent AF recurrences and time to each persistent AF episode recurrence. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (24%) developed their first persistent AT/AF after 147 ± 149 days. Follow up ranged from 14 to 499 days. Median AF burden in the week prior to persistent AF was 3.5 h/day. Fifty-four patients (16%) had a minimum of 180 days follow up after initial detection of persistent AF. Three of 54 patients (6%) immediately developed established AF; 32 of 51 patients (63%) returned to sinus rhythm but then had a second persistent AF event. These 32 patients had a minimum of 90 days follow up and 25 of these 32 patients (78 %) had a third persistent AF event. Time to recurrence analysis showed progressive abbreviation in persistent AF onset. The median durations of the first, second, and third persistent AF events were 16, 13, and 17 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The time to first, second, and third persistent AF recurrences progressively decreases with a high likelihood of established persistent AF within 9 months of onset. (2) These data support intermittent but frequent AF monitoring for the detection of persistent AF recurrences to assess the efficacy of rhythm control interventions.
Authors: Isabelle C Van Gelder; Vincent E Hagens; Hans A Bosker; J Herre Kingma; Otto Kamp; Tsjerk Kingma; Salah A Said; Julius I Darmanata; Alphons J M Timmermans; Jan G P Tijssen; Harry J G M Crijns Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Josep Brugada; Douglas L Packer; Riccardo Cappato; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Pierre Jais; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Bruce D Lindsay; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Andrea Natale; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-04-30 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Yoko Miyasaka; Marion E Barnes; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen S Cha; Kent R Bailey; Walter P Abhayaratna; James B Seward; Teresa S M Tsang Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bramah N Singh; Steven N Singh; Domenic J Reda; X Charlene Tang; Becky Lopez; Crystal L Harris; Ross D Fletcher; Satish C Sharma; J Edwin Atwood; Alan K Jacobson; H Daniel Lewis; Dennis W Raisch; Michael D Ezekowitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Luigi Padeletti; Helmut Pürerfellner; Stuart W Adler; Theodore J Waller; Mark Harvey; Lewis Horvitz; Reece Holbrook; Kitty Kempen; Andrew Mugglin; Douglas A Hettrick Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2003-11
Authors: Sheba Ahmed; Michiel Rienstra; Harry J G M Crijns; Thera P Links; Ans C P Wiesfeld; Hans L Hillege; Hans A Bosker; Dirk J A Lok; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen; Isabelle C Van Gelder Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Taya V Glotzer; Emile G Daoud; D George Wyse; Daniel E Singer; Michael D Ezekowitz; Christopher Hilker; Clayton Miller; Dongfeng Qi; Paul D Ziegler Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2009-08-04
Authors: R A Veasey; C Sugihara; K Sandhu; G Dhillon; N Freemantle; S S Furniss; A N Sulke Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Min Soo Cho; Jun Kim; Ju Hyeon Kim; Minsu Kim; Ji Hyun Lee; You Mi Hwang; Uk Jo; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; You-Ho Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240