Literature DB >> 21765359

High-frequency oscillation in adults: a utilization review.

Neill K J Adhikari1, Abdel Bashir, François Lamontagne, Sangeeta Mehta, Niall D Ferguson, Qi Zhou, Lori Hand, Kasia Czarnecka, Deborah J Cook, John T Granton, Jan O Friedrich, Andreas Freitag, Irene Watpool, Maureen O Meade.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: High-frequency oscillation is used for adults with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Given the uncertain benefits, our objective was to describe contemporary patient selection, high-frequency oscillation utilization, and outcomes.
DESIGN: Utilization review.
SETTING: Ten academic centers (Ontario, Canada; January 1, 2005-January 31, 2007). PATIENTS: We included 190 consecutive adults treated with high-frequency oscillation and retrospectively abstracted data on patient demographics, gas exchange, hemodynamics, settings during conventional ventilation and high-frequency oscillation, adjunctive therapies, and outcomes. We used logistic regression to explore associations with oxygenation response and hemodynamic and ventilatory complications (2 hrs after high-frequency oscillation initiation) and mortality. Continuous data are reported as mean (sd) or median (quartile 1, quartile 3).
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients (60.0% male; mean age, 52; sd 17) had predominantly acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (89.8%) and were severely ill (mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 28; sd, 9) and hypoxemic (mean Pao2/Fio2, 80; sd, 42). High-frequency oscillation was started a median of 2 (1, 8) days after intubation and continued for a median of 3 (2, 7) days. During high-frequency oscillation, adjunctive treatments (neuromuscular blockade, 75.6%; recruitment maneuvers, 49.5%; nitric oxide, 34.0%; steroids, 63.1%) and new barotrauma or chest tube placement (23.5%) were common. Ten patients (5.3%) had technical complications; five required a new ventilator. Reasons for stopping high-frequency oscillation included death or withdrawal of life support (39.1%), significant improvement in respiratory failure (37.6%), and inadequate improvement (23.3%). One hundred and twenty-eight of 189 patients died in hospital. Most (62.5%) had a positive oxygenation response after 2 hrs of high-frequency oscillation (mean absolute increase in PaO₂/FiO₂, 22 [SD, 54]; 95% confidence interval of mean 14-31). A minority had lower PaO₂/FiO₂ (32.5%) or a hemodynamic (27.5%) or ventilatory (30.5%) complication. Older age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and Paco2 before high-frequency oscillation were independently associated with mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients treated with high-frequency oscillation have acute respiratory distress syndrome and severe hypoxemia that modestly improves 2 hrs after high-frequency oscillation application. However, oxygenation worsens in some patients, complications are common, and mortality is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21765359     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318226675e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  9 in total

1.  Improved oxygenation 24 hours after transition to airway pressure release ventilation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation accurately discriminates survival in immunocompromised pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome*.

Authors:  Nadir Yehya; Alexis A Topjian; Neal J Thomas; Stuart H Friess
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  High frequency oscillation and airway pressure release ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure.

Authors:  Nadir Yehya; Alexis A Topjian; Richard Lin; Robert A Berg; Neal J Thomas; Stuart H Friess
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2013-07-12

3.  High frequency percussive ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Andrew D Butler; Cheryl L Dominick; Nadir Yehya
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2020-12-08

4.  High-frequency oscillation ventilation for hypercapnic failure of conventional ventilation in pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Sigrun Friesecke; Stephanie-Susanne Stecher; Peter Abel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Laurent Papazian; Cécile Aubron; Laurent Brochard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Alain Combes; Didier Dreyfuss; Jean-Marie Forel; Claude Guérin; Samir Jaber; Armand Mekontso-Dessap; Alain Mercat; Jean-Christophe Richard; Damien Roux; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Henri Faure
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.925

6.  Right over left ventricular end-diastolic area relevance to predict hemodynamic intolerance of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in patients with severe ARDS.

Authors:  Lionel Ursulet; Arnaud Roussiaux; Dominique Belcour; Cyril Ferdynus; Bernard-Alex Gauzere; David Vandroux; Julien Jabot
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Physiological predictors of survival during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Luigi Camporota; Tony Sherry; John Smith; Katie Lei; Angela McLuckie; Richard Beale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Is high-frequency oscillatory ventilation more effective and safer than conventional protective ventilation in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiao-ling Gu; Guan-nan Wu; Yan-wen Yao; Dong-hong Shi; Yong Song
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  High-frequency oscillatory ventilation guided by transpulmonary pressure in acute respiratory syndrome: an experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  Philipp Klapsing; Onnen Moerer; Christoph Wende; Peter Herrmann; Michael Quintel; Annalen Bleckmann; Jan Florian Heuer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.