Literature DB >> 21765175

An in vitro comparison of the frictional forces between archwires and self-ligating brackets of passive and active types.

Tsui-Hsien Huang1, Hoi-Shing Luk, Ying-Chi Hsu, Chia-Tze Kao.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the static and kinetic frictional forces generated by various contemporary designs of self-ligating brackets (SLBs) and different wire alloys. In total, six different brackets (four passive type SLB, one active SLB, and one conventional bracket) were investigated using stainless steel, nickel-titanium, and titanium-molybdenum alloy archwires of several sizes. The friction forces were measured by sliding on a bracket-wire combination system in an EZ instron testing machine. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to examine the wear effects of the wall surfaces of bracket slots. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was used to identify the elemental compositions of the bracket surfaces. The data were collected and statistically analysed using analysis of variance. The results of static and kinetic frictional forces were lower in passive type SLBs (P < 0.05), except in the Smart Clip bracket. The wire materials or wire dimensions in the present study showed similar friction forces with no statistical differences (P > 0.05). The wearing effects were not obviously found in bracket slots under SEM observation. Only conventional brackets and mini-Clippy SLB revealed nickel ions via EDS analysis. This study shows that passive SLBs are associated with lower static or kinetic friction forces than those of active SLBs or conventional brackets. Wear on the bracket slots was not observed in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21765175     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Effect of anodization on friction behavior of β‑titanium orthodontic archwires.

Authors:  Yueh-Tse Lee; Eric Jein-Wein Liou; Li-Ling Huang; Hsin-Jay Wu; Sinn-Wen Chen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Graziane Olímpio Pereira; Carla Maria Melleiro Gimenez; Lucas Prieto; Marcos Gabriel do Lago Prieto; Roberta Tarkany Basting
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

3.  Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Raquel Morais Castro; Perrin Smith Neto; Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta; Matheus Melo Pithon; Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Effect of passive self-ligating bracket placement on the posterior teeth on reduction of frictional force in sliding mechanics.

Authors:  Kyu-Ry Kim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Evaluation of the force generated by gradual deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional metallic, esthetic, and self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Manoela Fávaro Francisconi; Guilherme Janson; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Load-Deflection and Friction Properties of PEEK Wires as Alternative Orthodontic Wires.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Tada; Tohru Hayakawa; Yoshiki Nakamura
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Role of lubricants on friction between self-ligating brackets and archwires.

Authors:  Renata C Leal; Flávia L B Amaral; Fabiana M G França; Roberta T Basting; Cecilia P Turssi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Effects of third-order torque on frictional force of self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Takeshi Muguruma; Masahiro Iijima; William A Brantley; Karamdeep S Ahluwalia; Naohisa Kohda; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 9.  Resistance to sliding in orthodontics: misconception or method error? A systematic review and a proposal of a test protocol.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Aggeliki Papoutsi; Simona Dianiskova; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.