Literature DB >> 21765169

Reducing the variance of the prescribing preference-based instrumental variable estimates of the treatment effect.

Michal Abrahamowicz1, Marie-Eve Beauchamp, Raluca Ionescu-Ittu, Joseph A C Delaney, Louise Pilote.   

Abstract

Instrumental variable (IV) methods based on the physician's prescribing preference may remove bias due to unobserved confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. However, IV estimates, originally defined as the treatment prescribed for a single previous patient of a given physician, show important variance inflation. The authors proposed and validated in simulations a new method to reduce the variance of IV estimates even when physicians' preferences change over time. First, a potential "change-time," after which the physician's preference has changed, was estimated for each physician. Next, all patients of a given physician were divided into 2 homogeneous subsets: those treated before the change-time versus those treated after the change-time. The new IV was defined as the proportion of all previous patients in a corresponding homogeneous subset who were prescribed a specific drug. In simulations, all alternative IV estimators avoided strong bias of the conventional estimates. The change-time method reduced the standard deviation of the estimates by approximately 30% relative to the original previous patient-based IV. In an empirical example, the proposed IV correlated better with the actual treatment and yielded smaller standard errors than alternative IV estimators. Therefore, the new method improved the overall accuracy of IV estimates in studies with unobserved confounding and time-varying prescribing preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21765169     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  4 in total

1.  The impact of family caregivers on potentially inappropriate medication use in noninstitutionalized older adults with dementia.

Authors:  Joshua M Thorpe; Carolyn T Thorpe; Korey A Kennelty; Walid F Gellad; Richard Schulz
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2012-06-09

2.  Evaluating possible confounding by prescriber in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Jessica M Franklin; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Krista F Huybrechts; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Instrumental variable analysis in the context of dichotomous outcome and exposure with a numerical experiment in pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  Babagnidé François Koladjo; Sylvie Escolano; Pascale Tubert-Bitter
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  A theoretical exploration of therapeutic monomania as a physician-based instrumental variable.

Authors:  Brian J Potter; Colin Dormuth; Jacques Le Lorier
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.890

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.