BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopic placement of percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) requires the use of T-bar fasteners to affix the stomach to the anterior abdominal wall; the effect of T-fasteners on stoma tract maturation is unknown. The authors studied PG stoma tract maturation, comparing PG + gastropexy with standard percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS: Sixteen pigs underwent PG placement using a novel introducer kit. Three absorbable suture T-fasteners were placed around the stoma site, and PG was placed using the Russell method. A standard PEG was then placed using the Ponsky pull method, allowing each animal to serve as its own control. Gross and histopathological integrity of stoma tract formation was assessed at 1-3 weeks. RESULTS: At sacrifice, all PGs were intact with no evidence of infection, disruption, or significant leakage. Stoma tracts of all test and control sites were robust and histologically mature at all time points. Stoma tract diameters were also similar between test and control PGs (mean ± SEM: control 13.1 ± 0.7 mm, test 12.1 ± 0.4 mm; P = .2, n = 15). Histopathological evaluation demonstrated a generally comparable tissue response between test and control PGs, with slight decreases in fibrosis noted in test compared to control sites (P = .02, n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: Stoma tract maturation of PG with gastropexy provides similar results to standard PEG. Stoma tracts were mature at 1 week regardless of placement method. Placement and performance of PG using the new introducer kit with novel T-fasteners and absorbable suture yields effective gastric anchoring and has similar ease of use as standard PEG placement.
BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopic placement of percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) requires the use of T-bar fasteners to affix the stomach to the anterior abdominal wall; the effect of T-fasteners on stoma tract maturation is unknown. The authors studied PGstoma tract maturation, comparing PG + gastropexy with standard percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS: Sixteen pigs underwent PG placement using a novel introducer kit. Three absorbable suture T-fasteners were placed around the stoma site, and PG was placed using the Russell method. A standard PEG was then placed using the Ponsky pull method, allowing each animal to serve as its own control. Gross and histopathological integrity of stoma tract formation was assessed at 1-3 weeks. RESULTS: At sacrifice, all PGs were intact with no evidence of infection, disruption, or significant leakage. Stoma tracts of all test and control sites were robust and histologically mature at all time points. Stoma tract diameters were also similar between test and control PGs (mean ± SEM: control 13.1 ± 0.7 mm, test 12.1 ± 0.4 mm; P = .2, n = 15). Histopathological evaluation demonstrated a generally comparable tissue response between test and control PGs, with slight decreases in fibrosis noted in test compared to control sites (P = .02, n = 15). CONCLUSIONS:Stoma tract maturation of PG with gastropexy provides similar results to standard PEG. Stoma tracts were mature at 1 week regardless of placement method. Placement and performance of PG using the new introducer kit with novel T-fasteners and absorbable suture yields effective gastric anchoring and has similar ease of use as standard PEG placement.