BACKGROUND: Evidence of high exposure of UK youth to images of smoking in films has led to calls for an 18 rating for films with smoking to reduce smoking in youth. However, the only study to date in the UK to test for an association showed no relation between film-smoking exposure and smoking among young adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is an association between exposure to film images of smoking and own smoking among UK adolescents and whether repeated viewings of films has an impact. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 1999 pupils aged 15-16 years from 13 Scottish schools. Outcome Smoked tobacco in the past year. EXPOSURE MEASURE: Film-smoking exposure was assessed using the Beach method; account for repeated viewings of films was then used to modify estimated exposure. Covariates included: media usage, parental restriction on and context of TV/film viewing, family connectedness, parental monitoring and friends' smoking. RESULTS: Most (71%) students had not smoked in the past year. About half reported no parental restrictions on TV/film viewing. Many reported repeated viewings of films; accounting for this more than doubled exposure estimates and strengthened the association with smoking. Adolescents with high exposure to film smoking were more likely to have smoked than those with low exposure (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.08, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.55). Additionally, adolescents who reported parental rules about TV/film watching were less likely to smoke (AOR 0.37 (0.27 to 0.52)) than those who did not. Adolescents who mainly watched films with friends had higher exposure to film smoking and were more likely to smoke (AOR 2.19 (1.10 to 4.38)). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to film smoking is associated with smoking among Scottish adolescents. These data lend support to calls for an 18 rating for films with images of smoking.
BACKGROUND: Evidence of high exposure of UK youth to images of smoking in films has led to calls for an 18 rating for films with smoking to reduce smoking in youth. However, the only study to date in the UK to test for an association showed no relation between film-smoking exposure and smoking among young adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is an association between exposure to film images of smoking and own smoking among UK adolescents and whether repeated viewings of films has an impact. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 1999 pupils aged 15-16 years from 13 Scottish schools. Outcome Smoked tobacco in the past year. EXPOSURE MEASURE: Film-smoking exposure was assessed using the Beach method; account for repeated viewings of films was then used to modify estimated exposure. Covariates included: media usage, parental restriction on and context of TV/film viewing, family connectedness, parental monitoring and friends' smoking. RESULTS: Most (71%) students had not smoked in the past year. About half reported no parental restrictions on TV/film viewing. Many reported repeated viewings of films; accounting for this more than doubled exposure estimates and strengthened the association with smoking. Adolescents with high exposure to film smoking were more likely to have smoked than those with low exposure (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.08, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.55). Additionally, adolescents who reported parental rules about TV/film watching were less likely to smoke (AOR 0.37 (0.27 to 0.52)) than those who did not. Adolescents who mainly watched films with friends had higher exposure to film smoking and were more likely to smoke (AOR 2.19 (1.10 to 4.38)). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to film smoking is associated with smoking among Scottish adolescents. These data lend support to calls for an 18 rating for films with images of smoking.
Authors: Madeline A Dalton; James D Sargent; Michael L Beach; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Jennifer J Gibson; M Bridget Ahrens; Jennifer J Tickle; Todd F Heatherton Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-07-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James D Sargent; Michael L Beach; Madeline A Dalton; Linda Titus Ernstoff; Jennifer J Gibson; Jennifer J Tickle; Todd F Heatherton Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Rebecca N H de Leeuw; James D Sargent; Mike Stoolmiller; Ron H J Scholte; Rutger C M E Engels; Susanne E Tanski Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kristina M Jackson; Tim Janssen; Nancy P Barnett; Michelle L Rogers; Kerri L Hayes; James Sargent Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Elma I Lorenzo-Blanco; Erika N Abad-Vivero; Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Rosaura Pérez Hérnandez; Jennifer B Unger; James F Thrasher Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: James F Thrasher; James D Sargent; Rosa Vargas; Sandra Braun; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez; Eric L Sevigny; Deborah L Billings; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Ashley Navarro; James Hardin Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2013-09-19
Authors: Donna A Perez; Anne C Grunseit; Chris Rissel; James Kite; Trish Cotter; Sally Dunlop; Adrian Bauman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Matthis Morgenstern; James D Sargent; Rutger C M E Engels; Ron H J Scholte; Ewa Florek; Kate Hunt; Helen Sweeting; Federica Mathis; Fabrizio Faggiano; Reiner Hanewinkel Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 5.043