Literature DB >> 21764559

Validation study suggested no differential misclassification of self-reported mammography history in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Anouk Pijpe1, Renée L Mulder, Peggy Manders, Flora E van Leeuwen, Matti A Rookus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed accuracy of self-reported lifetime mammography history by BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with and without breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Within the framework of the HEBON study (The Netherlands Collaborative Group on Hereditary Breast Cancer), 218 Dutch BRCA1/2 mutation carriers had completed a risk factor questionnaire between 2006 and 2007. Accuracy of self-reported lifetime mammography history was assessed by medical record review and calculated by proportion agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ).
RESULTS: For 177 (81%) carriers, validation could be completed. Accuracy of reporting of ever/never exposure was excellent (i.e., agreement ≥ 93%, κ ≥ 0.81) for all time frames (lifetime, before age 30, and at ages 30-39). Accuracy of age at first mammogram was poor to moderate (i.e., 39%, κ=0.37) for exact agreement and improved to almost excellent (i.e., 70%, κ=0.69) for agreement within 1 year, indicating that differences were small. Although cases more often tended to underestimate their exact age at first mammogram, whereas unaffected carriers tended to overestimate, this difference in the direction of inaccuracy was not statistically significant (P=0.237). Accuracy of age at last mammogram was moderate and improved to excellent for agreement within 1 year. Carriers tended to underreport the time since last mammogram ("telescoping") and overreported the number of mammograms.
CONCLUSION: Accuracy of self-reported lifetime mammography history in carriers highly varied, depending on the measure under investigation. However, the extent of the observed misclassification was small and mostly nondifferential.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21764559     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  5 in total

1.  Self-reported mammography use following BRCA1/2 genetic testing may be overestimated.

Authors:  Geneviève Larouche; Karine Bouchard; Jocelyne Chiquette; Christine Desbiens; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Survivor typologies predict medical surveillance participation: the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Cheryl L Cox; Liang Zhu; Melissa M Hudson; Brenda D Steen; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Accuracy of Self-Reported Screening Mammography Use: Examining Recall among Female Relatives from the Ontario Site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Anna M Chiarelli; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-08-01

4.  Retrospective assessment of self-reported exposure to medical ionizing radiation: results of a feasibility study conducted in Germany.

Authors:  Steffen Dreger; Saskia Poettgen; Florence Samkange-Zeeb; Hiltrud Merzenich; Anye Ningo; Joachim Breckow; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-07-10

5.  Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK).

Authors:  Anouk Pijpe; Nadine Andrieu; Douglas F Easton; Ausrele Kesminiene; Elisabeth Cardis; Catherine Noguès; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Christine Lasset; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind A Eeles; Joan Paterson; Peggy Manders; Christi J van Asperen; Margreet G E M Ausems; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Michael Hauptmann; David Goldgar; Matti A Rookus; Flora E van Leeuwen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-09-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.