Literature DB >> 21764458

Antibiotic resistance in microbial keratitis: ten-year experience of corneal scrapes in the United Kingdom.

Zaid Shalchi1, Avinash Gurbaxani, Mark Baker, James Nash.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the scale of antibiotic resistance in microbial keratitis in East Kent, United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Corneal scrapes over a 10-year period to December 2008 were identified using the local microbiology database, which provided culture results and antibiotic sensitivity-resistance profiles. TESTING: Isolate sensitivity to chloramphenicol, cefuroxime, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin was determined by microdilution using the Microscan System (Siemens Diagnostics, Dearfield, IL). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isolates were graded as sensitive, intermediate, or resistant to the tested antibiotics, with minimal inhibitory concentrations interpreted against breakpoints from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
RESULTS: There were 476 scrapes from 440 patients (female, 57.6%; mean age, 53.5 years). All samples were cultured. Culture was positive in 163 samples (34.2%), growing 172 organisms. Bacterial keratitis accounted for 162 isolates (94.2%), of which 99 (61.1%) were gram-negative. There was a general increase in the number of gram-negative isolates with time (P=0.003). In vitro testing showed widespread gram-negative resistance to chloramphenicol (74.1%), with reducing sensitivity over the study period (P=0.004). There was 97.3% sensitivity to combination gentamicin and cefuroxime, and 94.4% sensitivity to ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin resistance was found in 8 (17.0%) of 47 gram-positive isolates tested, with no trend toward increasing resistance.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has documented the highest levels of gram-negative keratitis in any open retrospective survey to date and highlights a trend of increasing gram-negative infection. We have demonstrated reducing chloramphenicol sensitivity, with high sensitivity to combination gentamicin and cefuroxime, as well as ciprofloxacin. Gram-positive fluoroquinolone resistance was higher than previously reported in the United Kingdom, but showed no evidence of increasing resistance. Second-generation fluoroquinolone monotherapy remains the recommended empirical treatment in microbial keratitis in the United Kingdom, and a change to fourth-generation compounds is not advised. Continued testing is essential to monitor for increasing resistance. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21764458     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  21 in total

1.  Risk factors for contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Singapore.

Authors:  C H L Lim; N A Carnt; M Farook; J Lam; D T Tan; J S Mehta; F Stapleton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory findings of infectious keratitis at Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Egypt.

Authors:  Amani E Badawi; Dalia Moemen; Nora L El-Tantawy
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Lawson Ung; Paulo J M Bispo; Swapna S Shanbhag; Michael S Gilmore; James Chodosh
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 4.  Potential new fluoroquinolone treatments for suspected bacterial keratitis.

Authors:  Rose Herbert; Mary Caddick; Tobi Somerville; Keri McLean; Shakeel Herwitker; Timothy Neal; Gabriela Czanner; Stephen Tuft; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07

5.  New treatments for bacterial keratitis.

Authors:  Raymond L M Wong; R A Gangwani; Lester W H Yu; Jimmy S M Lai
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Predisposing Factors, Microbial Characteristics, and Clinical Outcome of Microbial Keratitis in a Tertiary Centre in Hong Kong: A 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Alex Lap-Ki Ng; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Chile Chi-Lai Choi; Leonard Hsu Yuen; Suk-Ming Yim; Keith Shun-Kit Chan; Jimmy Shiu-Ming Lai; Ian Yat-Hin Wong
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Clinical utility of antimicrobial susceptibility measurement plate covering formulated concentrations of various ophthalmic antimicrobial drugs.

Authors:  Norihiko Tou; Ryohei Nejima; Yoshifumi Ikeda; Yuichi Hori; Kaoru Araki-Sasaki; Kazunori Miyata; Yoshitsugu Inoue; Akihiko Tawara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-09

8.  Development of a novel micro-bead force spectroscopy approach to measure the ability of a thermo-active polymer to remove bacteria from a corneal model.

Authors:  J Pattem; T Swift; S Rimmer; T Holmes; S MacNeil; J Shepherd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Diversity of microbial species implicated in keratitis: a review.

Authors:  Elisabeth Karsten; Stephanie Lousie Watson; Leslie John Ray Foster
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2012-11-30

10.  Infectious keratitis: secreted bacterial proteins that mediate corneal damage.

Authors:  Mary E Marquart; Richard J O'Callaghan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.