Literature DB >> 21764093

Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in distilled water for 16 years.

Apinya Pumpuang1, Narisara Chantratita, Chanthiwa Wikraiphat, Natnaree Saiprom, Nicholas P J Day, Sharon J Peacock, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun.   

Abstract

Burkholderia pseudomallei was examined after being maintained in distilled water at 25°C for 16 years. The Gram stain was atypical (pale pink cocci or coccobacilli). The estimated number of live and dead B. pseudomallei was 3.8×10(7) cells/ml and 1.4×10(5) cells/ml, respectively. A colony count on agar of 1.0×10(6) cfu/ml suggested that a proportion of cells were in a viable but non-culturable state. Colony morphology was different from the parental isolate for 84% of colonies. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of AvrII DNA restriction fragments revealed six different but related banding patterns, which may represent genomic rearrangement.
Copyright © 2011 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21764093      PMCID: PMC3183224          DOI: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0035-9203            Impact factor:   2.184


Introduction

The Gram-negative, non spore forming bacillus Burkholderia pseudomallei is the cause of melioidosis and classified by CDC as a Category B select agent. Burkholderia pseudomallei is present in the environment in northern Australia and across much of southeast Asia, where human infection is acquired by bacterial inoculation, inhalation or ingestion.1, 2 In the absence of a vaccine, strategies for the prevention of melioidosis are based on reduction of exposure. These could potentially include efforts to reduce the bioburden of B. pseudomallei in specific environments, including clean-up operations in geographic areas that have become contaminated for the first time through accident or bioterrorist activity. This is likely to be hampered, however, by the extreme hardiness of this organism. In 1995, we reported that B. pseudomallei strain E32 had survived in distilled water (DW) for three years. Here, we extend these observations and report on the survival and preliminary characterisation of a strain of B. pseudomallei maintained in DW at 25 °C for 16 years.

Materials and methods

Burkholderia pseudomallei strain 207a was isolated in 1986 from blood taken from a rice farmer presenting to Sappasithiprasong Hospital in northeast Thailand, and stored in trypticase soya broth (TSB) with 15% glycerol at –80 °C. In 1994, the organism was sub-cultured onto Columbia agar and inoculated into 9 ml DW to obtain 3.0 x 1010 cfu/ml contained in a plain plastic tube with a screw cap that was tightened and then loosened by a half turn. This was maintained in a cupboard at 25 °C. In December 2008, the volume was noted to be around 2.5 ml and DW was added once to a total volume of 15 ml. In January 2010, an aliquot of 5 ml was removed for the work described below.

Results and Discussion

Gram stain and light microscopy of bacilli from the original freezer vial demonstrated typical Gram-negative rods, while bacilli from DW were pale pink cocci or coccobacilli. The proportion of live versus dead bacteria in DW was defined using the LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM viability stain according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). The estimated number of live and dead B. pseudomallei was 3.8 x 107 cells/ml and 1.4 x 105 cells/ml, respectively. Live bacteria were non-motile. A colony count was performed of the bacilli from DW on Ashdown agar (ASH) after serial dilution, spread plating, and incubation in air at 37 °C for four days. The count of 1.0 x 106 cfu/ml was less than the estimated number of live bacteria using the viability kit, suggesting that a proportion of cells may be in a viable but non-culturable state. The entire original freezer vial (a volume of 80 μl) was subcultured onto ASH and incubated in air at 37 °C for four days. This resulted in a total of just 236 colonies, suggestive of cell death during freezing. Aiming to identify at least the same number of colonies for the DW sample, we performed serial dilution and spread plating of DW onto ASH and picked 325 individual, unselected colonies for further analysis. The colony morphology of the 236 colonies from frozen stock was uniformly type I, the characteristic ‘cornflower head’ appearance. The colony morphology of 325 colonies from DW were classified (in descending order of frequency) as: types VII, 55%; I, 16%; III, 14%; VI, 10%; II, 4%; and V, 1% (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Colony morphology and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) banding pattern of Burkholderia pseudomallei strain 207a after being maintained in distilled water at 25 °C for 16 years. A total of 325 primary plate colonies were evaluated.

(A) Six colony morphologies were identified on Ashdown agar; the percentage of each type is shown. All 236 primary plate colonies from the original freezer vial were Type I (data not shown).

(B) Six related PFGE banding patterns (PT) were defined for the 325 DW colonies after AvrII restriction digest. The number of each PT, colony morphology and number of bands different from PT1 are shown. All 236 primary plate colonies from the freezer vial were PT1.

M: ladder marker; Lane 1: Freezer vial control colony (FOC111-I); Lanes 2–12: water isolates (strain numbers DC219-I, DC6-III, DC73-III, DC122-III, DC234-III, DC257-III, DC323-III, DC69-V, DC86-III, DC258-III, DC253-III).

Colony morphology and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) banding pattern of Burkholderia pseudomallei strain 207a after being maintained in distilled water at 25 °C for 16 years. A total of 325 primary plate colonies were evaluated. (A) Six colony morphologies were identified on Ashdown agar; the percentage of each type is shown. All 236 primary plate colonies from the original freezer vial were Type I (data not shown). (B) Six related PFGE banding patterns (PT) were defined for the 325 DW colonies after AvrII restriction digest. The number of each PT, colony morphology and number of bands different from PT1 are shown. All 236 primary plate colonies from the freezer vial were PT1. M: ladder marker; Lane 1: Freezer vial control colony (FOC111-I); Lanes 2–12: water isolates (strain numbers DC219-I, DC6-III, DC73-III, DC122-III, DC234-III, DC257-III, DC323-III, DC69-V, DC86-III, DC258-III, DC253-III). Each of the 561 colonies was treated as an individual ‘strain’ and examined for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pattern and banding pattern by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. LPS was extracted and examined using SDS-PAGE and silver-staining, as described previously. The LPS pattern was a typical smooth type A for all 561 colonies. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using SpeI and AvrII was performed as described previously, and the banding patterns analysed using the BioNumerics software version 2.5 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). The PFGE banding pattern of 236 freezer vial colonies showed no variability using either SpeI or AvrIl. The PFGE banding pattern of 325 DW colonies was identical using SpeI, but the AvrII restriction pattern revealed six different banding patterns. The AvrII restriction pattern for the freezer vial colonies was termed PT 1. A total of 315 DW colonies were also PT 1, while ten DW colonies had banding patterns that differed from the PT 1 pattern by 2 to 5 bands (Figure 1). The morphological appearance of the 10 strains with altered PFGE banding patterns was type III (nine colonies) or type V (one colony). Reversible colony morphology switching of B. pseudomallei has been described in response to adverse environmental conditions. The 10 variant colonies each underwent seven serial subcultures in TSB and were then plated onto ASH. No change in colony morphology was observed, suggesting a fixed genetic event associated with alteration in the presence or function of one or more genes encoding a major surface expressed determinant. Our findings provide further evidence for the ability of B. pseudomallei to survive under extreme conditions. A proportion of colonies appeared to have undergone a putative genetic event based on PFGE banding pattern changes. This is the subject of further investigation.

Author contributions

AP, NC, CW and NS performed the experimental work, data analysis and assisted in drafting the article. NC and SP designed the study protocol, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. ND and VW provided B. pseudomallei isolates, contributed to the conception of the study and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Wellcome Trust, UK (grant number 089275/B/09/Z). NC holds a Wellcome Trust Career Development award in Public Health and Tropical Medicine.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Ethical approval

Not required.
  5 in total

1.  Biological relevance of colony morphology and phenotypic switching by Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Narisara Chantratita; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Khaemaporn Boonbumrung; Rachaneeporn Tiyawisutsri; Mongkol Vesaratchavest; Direk Limmathurotsakul; Wirongrong Chierakul; Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin; Sasithorn Pukritiyakamee; Nicholas J White; Nicholas P J Day; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in the absence of nutrients.

Authors:  V Wuthiekanun; M D Smith; N J White
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.184

3.  Increasing incidence of human melioidosis in Northeast Thailand.

Authors:  Direk Limmathurotsakul; Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin; Nittaya Teerawattanasook; Gumphol Wongsuvan; Seksan Chaisuksant; Ploenchan Chetchotisakd; Wipada Chaowagul; Nicholas P J Day; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 4.  Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  W Joost Wiersinga; Tom van der Poll; Nicholas J White; Nicholas P Day; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity among Burkholderia pseudomallei from different geographic and clinical origins.

Authors:  Narisara Anuntagool; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Nicholas J White; Bart J Currie; Rasana W Sermswan; Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin; Suwimol Taweechaisupapong; Sansanee C Chaiyaroj; Stitaya Sirisinha
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.345

  5 in total
  40 in total

Review 1.  Human Melioidosis.

Authors:  I Gassiep; M Armstrong; R Norton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Evaluation of liquid and solid culture media for the recovery and enrichment of Burkholderia cenocepacia from distilled water.

Authors:  Youngbeom Ahn; Jeong Myeong Kim; Hyeri Ahn; Yong-Jin Lee; John J LiPuma; David Hussong; Carl E Cerniglia
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Cranial melioidosis with extradural extension after a fall in the bathroom.

Authors:  Kushal Naha; Sowjanya Dasari; Ramamoorthi Kusugodlu; Mukhyaprana Prabhu
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-09-09

4.  Alteration of the phenotypic and pathogenic patterns of Burkholderia pseudomallei that persist in a soil environment.

Authors:  Yao-Shen Chen; Wun-Ju Shieh; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Maureen G Metcalfe; Patricia W Greer; Sherif R Zaki; Hsin-Hou Chang; Hao Chan; Ya-Lei Chen
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Survival and susceptibility of Burkholderia cepacia complex in chlorhexidine gluconate and benzalkonium chloride.

Authors:  Jeong Myeong Kim; Youngbeom Ahn; John J LiPuma; David Hussong; Carl E Cerniglia
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  Inactivation of bacterial biothreat agents in water, a review.

Authors:  L J Rose; E W Rice
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.744

7.  Colony morphology variation of Burkholderia pseudomallei is associated with antigenic variation and O-polysaccharide modification.

Authors:  Chanthiwa Wikraiphat; Natnaree Saiprom; Sarunporn Tandhavanant; Christian Heiss; Parastoo Azadi; Gumphol Wongsuvan; Apichai Tuanyok; Matthew T G Holden; Mary N Burtnick; Paul J Brett; Sharon J Peacock; Narisara Chantratita
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Burkholderia cepacia Complex Bacteria: a Feared Contamination Risk in Water-Based Pharmaceutical Products.

Authors:  Mariana Tavares; Mariya Kozak; Alexandra Balola; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Morphological Alteration and Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Soil Microcosms.

Authors:  Watcharaporn Kamjumphol; Pisit Chareonsudjai; Suwimol Taweechaisupapong; Sorujsiri Chareonsudjai
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 10.  Melioidosis.

Authors:  W Joost Wiersinga; Harjeet S Virk; Alfredo G Torres; Bart J Currie; Sharon J Peacock; David A B Dance; Direk Limmathurotsakul
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 52.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.