Literature DB >> 21763903

Effect of irrigants on the survival of human stem cells of the apical papilla in a platelet-rich plasma scaffold in human root tips.

Ernesto G Trevino1, Amol N Patwardhan, Michael A Henry, Griffin Perry, Nicholas Dybdal-Hargreaves, Kenneth M Hargreaves, Anibal Diogenes.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intracanal disinfection is a crucial step in regenerative endodontic procedures. However, this novel endodontic treatment lacks standardization, and numerous treatment protocols have been reported without knowledge of the effect of disinfection protocols on the survival of stem cells. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that different root canal irrigation protocols alter survival of stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP).
METHODS: SCAP were isolated from immature human third molars, and a subpopulation of STRO-1 expressing cells was selected and expanded in vitro. Standardized human root segments (n = 5/group) were irrigated with 1 of 4 protocols: (1) 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), (2) 6% NaOCl/17% EDTA/6% NaOCl, (3) 17% EDTA/2% chlorhexidine (CHX), or (4) 6% NaOCl/17% EDTA/6% NaOCl/isopropyl alcohol/2% CHX. Subsequently, STRO-1-enriched SCAP were mixed with platelet-rich-plasma, seeded into the root tips, and cultured for 21 days. Roots were then decalcified, processed for immunohistochemistry, and stained for vimentin and TO-PRO-3. The proportion of viable (vimentin-positive) cells was calculated on the basis of the total cell counts (TO-PRO-3) for each group.
RESULTS: Irrigation with 17% EDTA best supported cell survival (89% viability; P < .001 versus all other groups), followed by irrigation with 6% NaOCl/17% EDTA/6% NaOCl (74%; P < .001 versus the 2 groups containing 2% CHX). Conversely, protocols that included 2% CHX lacked any viable cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, the results suggest that irrigants alone greatly affect the survivability of STRO-1-enriched SCAP within the root canal environment and that inclusion of EDTA in irrigation protocols might be beneficial in regenerative procedures. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21763903     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  59 in total

Review 1.  Treatment options: biological basis of regenerative endodontic procedures.

Authors:  Kenneth M Hargreaves; Anibal Diogenes; Fabricio B Teixeira
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  A comparison between two negative pressure irrigation techniques in simulated immature tooth: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamleh; Yasue Fukumoto; Yoshioka Takatomo; Chihiro Kobayashi; Hideaki Suda; Carlos G Adorno
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Regeneration of pulp-dentin complex using human stem cells of the apical papilla: in vivo interaction with two bioactive materials.

Authors:  Diana B Sequeira; Ana Rafaela Oliveira; Catarina M Seabra; Paulo J Palma; Carlos Ramos; Maria H Figueiredo; Ana C Santos; Ana L Cardoso; João Peça; João Miguel Santos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical Evidence for Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: Immediate versus Delayed Induction?

Authors:  Tatiana M Botero; Xianli Tang; Richard Gardner; Jan C C Hu; James R Boynton; G Rex Holland
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Regenerative endodontic therapy for managing immature non-vital teeth: a national survey of UK paediatric dental specialists and trainees.

Authors:  H Nazzal; H Tong; P Nixon; M Duggal
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Regenerative Dentistry: Animal Model for Regenerative Endodontology.

Authors:  Nisarat Ruangsawasdi; Matthias Zehnder; Raphael Patcas; Chafik Ghayor; Franz E Weber
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.747

7.  Dental pulp stem cell responses to novel antibiotic-containing scaffolds for regenerative endodontics.

Authors:  K Kamocki; J E Nör; M C Bottino
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.264

8.  Cytotoxicity assessment of different doses of ozonated water on dental pulp cells.

Authors:  Ferdiye Küçük; Sibel Yıldırım; Serap Çetiner
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Evaluation of the regenerative potential of dentin conditioning and naturally derived scaffold for necrotic immature permanent teeth in a dog model.

Authors:  Hisham M El Halaby; Ashraf M Abu-Seida; Mervat I Fawzy; Mona H Farid; Hagar A Bastawy
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 10.  Effect of biomaterials on angiogenesis during vital pulp therapy.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Saghiri; Armen Asatourian; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Nader Sheibani
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.