Literature DB >> 21763519

Sensory feedback for upper limb prostheses.

Steven S Hsiao1, Michael Fettiplace, Bejan Darbandi.   

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the neurophysiological basis of how to provide sensory feedback to users with an upper limb prosthesis and discuss some of the theoretical issues that need to be considered when directly stimulating neurons in the somatosensory system. We focus on technologies that are currently available and discuss approaches that are most likely to succeed in providing natural perception from the artificial hand to the user. First, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of providing feedback by stimulating directly the remaining afferents that originally innervated the arm and hand. In particular, we pay close attention to the normal functional roles that the peripheral afferents play in perception. What are the consequences and implications of stimulating these afferents? We then discuss whether it is reasonable to stimulate neurons in the ascending pathways that carry the information from the afferents to the cortex or directly in neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex. We show that for some modalities there are advantages for stimulating in the spinal cord, while for others it is advantageous to stimulate directly in the somatosensory cortex. Finally, we discuss results from a current experiment in which we used electrical stimuli in primary somatosensory cortex to restore the percept of the intensity of a mechanical probe indented into the hand. The results suggest that the simple percept of stimulus intensity can be provided to the animal from a single finger using four electrodes. We propose that significantly more electrodes will be needed to reproduce more complex aspects of tactile perception.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21763519     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00005-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  8 in total

Review 1.  Genetically identified spinal interneurons integrating tactile afferents for motor control.

Authors:  Tuan V Bui; Nicolas Stifani; Izabela Panek; Carl Farah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 3.  Implantable neurotechnologies: bidirectional neural interfaces--applications and VLSI circuit implementations.

Authors:  Elliot Greenwald; Matthew R Masters; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  The vision of Hsiao on somatosensation.

Authors:  Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Study of single and multidigit activation in monkey somatosensory cortex using voltage-sensitive dye imaging.

Authors:  Anna Wang Roe; Jeremy E Winberry; Robert M Friedman
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.593

Review 6.  Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review.

Authors:  Usman Ghafoor; Sohee Kim; Keum-Shik Hong
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Computationally efficient modeling of proprioceptive signals in the upper limb for prostheses: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ian Williams; Timothy G Constandinou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Treatment Recommendations for Phantom Limb Pain in People with Amputations: An Expert Consensus Delphi Study.

Authors:  Katleho Limakatso; Romy Parker
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.