| Literature DB >> 21763387 |
Hans Verhagen1, Rikke Andersen, Jean-Michel Antoine, Paul Finglas, Jeljer Hoekstra, Alwine Kardinaal, Hervé Nordmann, Gülden Pekcan, Kristina Pentieva, Tom A Sanders, Henk van den Berg, Henk van Kranen, Alessandro Chiodini.
Abstract
The respective examples, described in this paper, illustrate how the BRAFO-tiered approach, on benefit-risk assessment, can be tested on a wide range of case studies. Various results were provided, ranging from a quick stop as the result of non-genuine benefit-risk questions to continuation through the tiers into deterministic/probabilistic calculations. The paper illustrates the assessment of benefits and risks associated with dietary interventions. The BRAFO tiered approach is tested with five case studies. In each instance, the benefit-risk approach is tested on the basis of existing evaluations for the individual effects done by others; no new risk or benefit evaluations were made. The following case studies were thoroughly analysed: an example of food fortification, folic acid fortification of flour, macronutrient replacement/food substitution; the isocaloric replacement of saturated fatty acids with carbohydrates; the replacement of saturated fatty acids with monounsaturated fatty acids; the replacement of sugar-sweetened beverages containing mono- and disaccharides with low calorie sweeteners and an example of addition of specific ingredients to food: chlorination of drinking water.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21763387 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem Toxicol ISSN: 0278-6915 Impact factor: 6.023