Literature DB >> 21763052

[Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications].

Ewout W Steyerberg1, Ben Van Calster, Michael J Pencina.   

Abstract

Prediction models are becoming more and more important in medicine and cardiology. Nowadays, specific interest focuses on ways in which models can be improved using new prognostic markers. We aim to describe the similarities and differences between performance measures for prediction models. We analyzed data from 3264 subjects to predict 10-year risk of coronary heart disease according to age, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking. We specifically study the incremental value of adding high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to this model. We emphasize that we need to separate the evaluation of predictions, where traditional performance measures such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration are useful, from the evaluation of classifications, where various other statistics are now available, including the net reclassification index and net benefit.
Copyright © 2011 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21763052     DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8932            Impact factor:   4.753


  17 in total

1.  Recommendations of the current guidelines for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Debate still exists.

Authors:  Arya Aminorroaya; Ali Vasheghani-Farahani; Farzad Masoudkabir; Pegah Roayaei
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Assessing improvement in disease prediction using net reclassification improvement: impact of risk cut-offs and number of risk categories.

Authors:  Kristin Mühlenbruch; Alexandros Heraclides; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hans-Georg Joost; Heiner Boeing; Matthias B Schulze
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Prediction models for risk classification in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Progress of statistical analysis in biomedical research through the historical review of the development of the Framingham score.

Authors:  Aleksandra Ignjatović; Miodrag Stojanović; Zoran Milošević; Marija Anđelković Apostolović
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Rapid thrombelastography thresholds for goal-directed resuscitation of patients at risk for massive transfusion.

Authors:  Peter M Einersen; Ernest E Moore; Michael P Chapman; Hunter B Moore; Eduardo Gonzalez; Christopher C Silliman; Anirban Banerjee; Angela Sauaia
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  Predictive value of semi-quantitative MRI-based scoring systems for future knee replacement: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Bashir Zikria; John Eng; John A Carrino; Shadpour Demehri
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Validation of Random Forest Machine Learning Models to Predict Dementia-Related Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Real-World Data.

Authors:  Javier Mar; Ania Gorostiza; Oliver Ibarrondo; Carlos Cernuda; Arantzazu Arrospide; Álvaro Iruin; Igor Larrañaga; Mikel Tainta; Enaitz Ezpeleta; Ane Alberdi
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 8.  Evaluation of markers and risk prediction models: overview of relationships between NRI and decision-analytic measures.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Andrew J Vickers; Michael J Pencina; Stuart G Baker; Dirk Timmerman; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Predicting the risk for major bleeding in elderly patients with venous thromboembolism using the Charlson index. Findings from the RIETE.

Authors:  Covadonga Gómez-Cuervo; Agustina Rivas; Adriana Visonà; Nuria Ruiz-Giménez; Ángeles Blanco-Molina; Inmaculada Cañas; José Portillo; Patricia López-Miguel; Katia Flores; Manuel Monreal
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  FARMS: A New Algorithm for Variable Selection.

Authors:  Susana Perez-Alvarez; Guadalupe Gómez; Christian Brander
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.