Literature DB >> 21763042

Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals.

M Ågerstrand1, A Küster, J Bachmann, M Breitholtz, I Ebert, B Rechenberg, C Rudén.   

Abstract

Ecotoxicity data with high reliability and relevance are needed to guarantee the scientific quality of environmental risk assessments of pharmaceuticals. The main advantages of a more structured approach to data evaluation include increased transparency and predictability of the risk assessment process, and the possibility to use non-standard data. In this collaboration, between the research project MistraPharma and the German Federal Environment Agency, a new set of reporting and evaluation criteria is presented and discussed. The new criteria are based on the approaches in the literature and the OECD reporting requirements, and have been further developed to include both reliability and relevance of test data. Intended users are risk assessors and researchers performing ecotoxicological experiments, but the criteria can also be used for education purposes and in the peer-review process for scientific papers. This approach intends to bridge the gap between the regulator and the scientist's needs and way of work.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21763042     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  10 in total

1.  Issues to consider in the derivation of water quality benchmarks for the protection of aquatic life.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards.

Authors:  Andrew A Rooney; Glinda S Cooper; Gloria D Jahnke; Juleen Lam; Rebecca L Morgan; Abee L Boyles; Jennifer M Ratcliffe; Andrew D Kraft; Holger J Schünemann; Pamela Schwingl; Teneille D Walker; Kristina A Thayer; Ruth M Lunn
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Implementing ecopharmacovigilance in practice: challenges and potential opportunities.

Authors:  Gisela Holm; Jason R Snape; Richard Murray-Smith; John Talbot; David Taylor; Pernilla Sörme
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Marlene Ågerstrand; Anna Beronius; Claire Beausoleil; Åke Bergman; Lisa A Bero; Carl-Gustaf Bornehag; C Scott Boyer; Glinda S Cooper; Ian Cotgreave; David Gee; Philippe Grandjean; Kathryn Z Guyton; Ulla Hass; Jerrold J Heindel; Susan Jobling; Karen A Kidd; Andreas Kortenkamp; Malcolm R Macleod; Olwenn V Martin; Ulf Norinder; Martin Scheringer; Kristina A Thayer; Jorma Toppari; Paul Whaley; Tracey J Woodruff; Christina Rudén
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Epigenetic Applications in Adverse Outcome Pathways and Environmental Risk Evaluation.

Authors:  Michelle M Angrish; Patrick Allard; Shaun D McCullough; Ingrid L Druwe; Lisa Helbling Chadwick; Erin Hines; Brian N Chorley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Screening and prioritization of nano- and microplastic particle toxicity studies for evaluating human health risks - development and application of a toxicity study assessment tool.

Authors:  Todd Gouin; Robert Ellis-Hutchings; Leah M Thornton Hampton; Christine L Lemieux; Stephanie L Wright
Journal:  Microplast nanoplast       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 7.  A Critical Review of the Availability, Reliability, and Ecological Relevance of Arctic Species Toxicity Tests for Use in Environmental Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Rebecca J Eldridge; Benjamin P de Jourdan; Mark L Hanson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.218

8.  Application of evidence-based methods to construct mechanism-driven chemical assessment frameworks.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoffmann; Elisa Aiassa; Michelle Angrish; Claire Beausoleil; Frederic Y Bois; Laura Ciccolallo; Peter S Craig; Rob B M De Vries; Jean Lou C M Dorne; Ingrid L Druwe; Stephen W Edwards; Chantra Eskes; Marios Georgiadis; Thomas Hartung; Aude Kienzler; Elisabeth A Kristjansson; Juleen Lam; Laura Martino; Bette Meek; Rebecca L Morgan; Irene Munoz-Guajardo; Pamela D Noyes; Elena Parmelli; Aldert Piersma; Andrew Rooney; Emily Sena; Kristie Sullivan; José Tarazona; Andrea Terron; Kris Thayer; Jan Turner; Jos Verbeek; Didier Verloo; Mathieu Vinken; Sean Watford; Paul Whaley; Daniele Wikoff; Kate Willett; Katya Tsaioun
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.250

Review 9.  Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Krauth; Tracey J Woodruff; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating ecotoxicity Data (CRED): comparison and perception of the Klimisch and CRED methods for evaluating reliability and relevance of ecotoxicity studies.

Authors:  Robert Kase; Muris Korkaric; Inge Werner; Marlene Ågerstrand
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.893

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.