BACKGROUND: Repeated exposure to mild stressors induces anhedonia-a core symptom of major depressive disorder-in up to 70% of the stress-exposed rats, whereas the remaining show resilience to stress. This chronic mild stress (CMS) model is well documented as an animal model of major depressive disorder. We examined the morphological, microstructural, and metabolic characteristics of the hippocampus in anhedonic and stress resilient rats that may mark the differential behavioral outcome. METHODS: Anhedonic (n = 8), resilient (n = 8), and control (n = 8) rats were subjected to in vivo diffusion kurtosis imaging, high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: Diffusion kurtosis parameters were decreased in both CMS-exposed groups. A significant inward displacement in the ventral part of the right hippocampus was apparent in the resilient subjects and an increase of the glutamate:total creatine ratio and N-acetylaspartylglutamate:total creatine was observed in the anhedonic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion kurtosis imaging discloses subtle substructural changes in the hippocampus of CMS-exposed animals irrespective of their anhedonic or resilient nature. In contrast, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging-based shape change analysis of the hippocampus allowed discrimination of these two subtypes of stress sensitivity. Although the precise mechanism discriminating their behavior is yet to be elucidated, the present study underlines the role of the hippocampus in the etiology of depression and the induction of anhedonia. Our results reflect the potency of noninvasive magnetic resonance methods in preclinical settings with key translational benefit to and from the clinic.
BACKGROUND: Repeated exposure to mild stressors induces anhedonia-a core symptom of major depressive disorder-in up to 70% of the stress-exposed rats, whereas the remaining show resilience to stress. This chronic mild stress (CMS) model is well documented as an animal model of major depressive disorder. We examined the morphological, microstructural, and metabolic characteristics of the hippocampus in anhedonic and stress resilient rats that may mark the differential behavioral outcome. METHODS: Anhedonic (n = 8), resilient (n = 8), and control (n = 8) rats were subjected to in vivo diffusion kurtosis imaging, high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: Diffusion kurtosis parameters were decreased in both CMS-exposed groups. A significant inward displacement in the ventral part of the right hippocampus was apparent in the resilient subjects and an increase of the glutamate:total creatine ratio and N-acetylaspartylglutamate:total creatine was observed in the anhedonic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion kurtosis imaging discloses subtle substructural changes in the hippocampus of CMS-exposed animals irrespective of their anhedonic or resilient nature. In contrast, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging-based shape change analysis of the hippocampus allowed discrimination of these two subtypes of stress sensitivity. Although the precise mechanism discriminating their behavior is yet to be elucidated, the present study underlines the role of the hippocampus in the etiology of depression and the induction of anhedonia. Our results reflect the potency of noninvasive magnetic resonance methods in preclinical settings with key translational benefit to and from the clinic.
Authors: Ricardo Magalhães; Ashley Novais; David A Barrière; Paulo Marques; Fernanda Marques; João C Sousa; João J Cerqueira; Arnaud Cachia; Therese M Jay; Michel Bottlaender; Nuno Sousa; Sébastien Mériaux; Fawzi Boumezbeur Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Amit Khairnar; Peter Latta; Eva Drazanova; Jana Ruda-Kucerova; Nikoletta Szabó; Anas Arab; Birgit Hutter-Paier; Daniel Havas; Manfred Windisch; Alexandra Sulcova; Zenon Starcuk; Irena Rektorova Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 3.911
Authors: S Sekar; E Jonckers; M Verhoye; R Willems; J Veraart; J Van Audekerke; J Couto; M Giugliano; K Wuyts; S Dedeurwaerdere; J Sijbers; C Mackie; L Ver Donck; T Steckler; A Van der Linden Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Ulrich Rabl; Bernhard M Meyer; Kersten Diers; Lucie Bartova; Andreas Berger; Dominik Mandorfer; Ana Popovic; Christian Scharinger; Julia Huemer; Klaudius Kalcher; Gerald Pail; Helmuth Haslacher; Thomas Perkmann; Christian Windischberger; Burkhard Brocke; Harald H Sitte; Daniela D Pollak; Jean-Claude Dreher; Siegfried Kasper; Nicole Praschak-Rieder; Ewald Moser; Harald Esterbauer; Lukas Pezawas Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Ahmad Raza Khan; Andrey Chuhutin; Ove Wiborg; Christopher D Kroenke; Jens R Nyengaard; Brian Hansen; Sune Nørhøj Jespersen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jennifer L Remus; Luke T Stewart; Robert M Camp; Colleen M Novak; John D Johnson Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 1.912