Literature DB >> 21762868

Tag, you're it: tagging as an alternative to yes/no recognition in item method directed forgetting.

Kate M Thompson1, Jonathan M Fawcett, Tracy L Taylor.   

Abstract

The current study contrasted a standard yes/no recognition task with a tagging recognition task in the context of an item-method directed forgetting paradigm. During the study phase, a series of words was presented one at a time, each followed by an instruction to remember (R) or forget (F). The retention of R and F study words was tested using either a typical yes/no recognition task or a tagging recognition task in which participants labeled each word as "R", "F" or "New". The directed forgetting effect observed in each task was equivalent in magnitude. However, the tagging recognition task afforded an additional analysis of the errors of misattribution that was not possible with the more typical yes/no recognition task. Interestingly, when falsely recognizing a Foil word, participants were more likely to assign an "F" tag than an "R" tag. These errors of misattribution are consistent with existing accounts of directed forgetting that suggest R words are better encoded than F words. We argue for the utility of the tagging procedure, given it does not alter the directed forgetting effect normally seen with yes/no recognition but provides additional information about errors of misattribution.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21762868     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  8 in total

1.  Forgetting under difficult conditions: Item-method directed forgetting under perceptual processing constraints.

Authors:  Tracy L Taylor; Jason Ivanoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-01

2.  The effects of context in item-based directed forgetting: Evidence for "one-shot" context storage.

Authors:  Nicole Burgess; William E Hockley; Kathleen L Hourihan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

3.  Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.

Authors:  Matthew G Rhodes; Amber E Witherby; Alan D Castel; Kou Murayama
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

4.  The representational consequences of intentional forgetting: Impairments to both the probability and fidelity of long-term memory.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Michael A Lawrence; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01

5.  What do laboratory-forgetting paradigms tell us about use-inspired forgetting?

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Ashleigh M Maxcey
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-07

6.  Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information.

Authors:  Dillon H Murphy; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-20

7.  Positivity effect in source attributions of arousal-matched emotional and non-emotional words during item-based directed forgetting.

Authors:  Sara N Gallant; Lixia Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-18

8.  Directed forgetting of pictures of everyday objects.

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Ashleigh M Maxcey
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.