Literature DB >> 21761551

Next level of immunosuppression: drug/immune monitoring.

Josh Levitsky1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: 1. Current immunological monitoring relies heavily on clinical judgment and therapeutic drug levels and does not adequately assess the functional or donor-specific immunosuppression (IS) status of recipients of liver transplantation (LT). 2. Trough levels of drugs are arbitrary and are more clinically relevant for preventing supratherapeutic or subtherapeutic dosing and blood concentrations and for more closely monitoring at-risk populations (children, the elderly, and patients with organ dysfunction). The AUC or the post-dose levels may be more precise, but they have not been used extensively by transplant centers. 3. Data on drug/immune monitoring specific to LT are fairly limited; therefore, clinical practice is often borrowed from experiences with nonhepatic transplantation (mainly renal transplantation). 4. The monitoring of drug levels in patients taking generic immunosuppressants is challenging because the formulations may change with each prescription. The monitoring of drug or antibody levels is not yet clinically available for biological therapies (induction, lymphocyte-depleting, and maintenance agents). 5. Polymorphisms in drug metabolism (cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein) may be useful in selecting the initial and maintenance dosages of immunosuppressants and in preventing complications from over or underimmunosuppression. 6. Future immune monitoring assays should be focused on genomic or immunological predispositions and on specific reactivities to donor antigens to guide the appropriate dosing and minimization of IS after LT.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21761551     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current status of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Narendra S Choudhary; Sanjiv Saigal; Rajat Shukla; Hardik Kotecha; Neeraj Saraf; Arvinder S Soin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-03

Review 2.  Immune monitoring post liver transplant.

Authors:  Siddharth Sood; Adam G Testro
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-03-24

3.  Immunoregulatory Effects of Everolimus on In Vitro Alloimmune Responses.

Authors:  Josh Levitsky; Joshua Miller; Xuemei Huang; Lorenzo Gallon; Joseph R Leventhal; James M Mathew
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Antibody Diversity in Cancer: Translational Implications and Beyond.

Authors:  Raghuram Reddy; Joel Mintz; Roei Golan; Fakiha Firdaus; Roxana Ponce; Derek Van Booven; Aysswarya Manoharan; Isabelle Issa; Bonnie B Blomberg; Himanshu Arora
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Immune monitoring after pediatric liver transplantation - the prospective ChilSFree cohort study.

Authors:  Imeke Goldschmidt; André Karch; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Frauke Mutschler; Norman Junge; Eva Doreen Pfister; Tamara Möhring; Lorenzo d'Antiga; Patrick McKiernan; Deirdre Kelly; Dominique Debray; Valérie McLin; Joanna Pawlowska; Loreto Hierro; Kerstin Daemen; Jana Keil; Christine Falk; Ulrich Baumann
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature.

Authors:  Josh Levitsky; Manoj Kandpal; Kexin Guo; Lihui Zhao; Sunil Kurian; Thomas Whisenant; Michael Abecassis
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.385

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.