Literature DB >> 2176134

High-dose cisplatin and mitomycin C in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Northern California Oncology Group.

D R Gandara1, E A Perez, H Wold, V Caggiano, M Malec, D K Ahn, F Meyers, R W Carlson.   

Abstract

To investigate chemotherapeutic dose intensity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we evaluated a pharmacokinetically designed schedule of high-dose cisplatin (200 mg/m2 per 28-day cycle) plus mitomycin C. Between March 1987 and March 1989, 62 patients were registered for a phase II study of the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG). The treatment schedule consisted of cisplatin in hypertonic saline given on a divided days 1 and 8 schedule (100 mg/m2 on each day) plus mitomycin C given at a dose of 8 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle. In 61 patients evaluable for response analysis, the overall response rate was 39% (24/61), with a complete response being achieved in 6% (4/61) of cases and a partial response, in 33% (20/61). The response according to reviewed histologic subtype included squamous, 53% of patients (10/19); large cell, 31% (4/13); and adenocarcinoma, 34% (10/29). The median survival for all patients was 29.3 weeks. The mean cisplatin and mitomycin C delivered dose intensities in this study were 45 mg/m2 per week (90% of the projected dose) and 1.5 mg/m2 per week (75%). The toxicity of this combination regimen in the 62 enrolled patients was significant but manageable. Leukopenia (WBC, less than 1,000/mm3) and thrombocytopenia (platelets, less than 25,000/mm3) occurred in 3% and 8% of patients treated, respectively. Dose-limiting renal toxicity and clinically significant ototoxicity developed in 8 patients each (13%), and a peripheral sensory neuropathy was observed in 17 cases (27%). Whether this type of dose-intensive therapy results in an improved therapeutic index in NSCLC is currently being evaluated in a randomized comparative trial versus standard-dose cisplatin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2176134     DOI: 10.1007/BF00685721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  21 in total

1.  High-dose cisplatin in hypertonic saline in refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R F Ozols; Y Ostchega; C E Myers; R C Young
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  High-dose cisplatin for lung cancer.

Authors:  V K Bhuchar; V J Lanzotti
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1982-02

3.  Progress in chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J P Sculier; J Klastersky
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-11

Review 4.  The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  W Hryniuk; H Bush
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Chemotherapy of metastatic non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  P C Hoffman; J D Bitran; H M Golomb
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  High-dose cisplatin in hypertonic saline: reduced toxicity of a modified dose schedule and correlation with plasma pharmacokinetics. A Northern California Oncology Group Pilot Study in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D R Gandara; M W DeGregorio; H Wold; B J Wilbur; M Kohler; H J Lawrence; A B Deisseroth; C B George
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Cisplatin versus cisplatin plus etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Party, Belgium.

Authors:  J Klastersky; J P Sculier; G Bureau; P Libert; P Ravez; G Vandermoten; J Thiriaux; J Lecomte; R Cordier; G Dabouis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cisplatin dose intensity in non-small cell lung cancer: phase II results of a day 1 and day 8 high-dose regimen.

Authors:  D R Gandara; H Wold; E A Perez; A B Deisseroth; J Doroshow; F Meyers; K McWhirter; J Hannigan; M W De Gregorio
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-05-10       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  cis-Dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) alone followed by adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide at progression versus cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II), adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide in combination for adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  J C Britell; R T Eagan; J N Ingle; E T Creagen; J Rubin; S Frytak
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-08

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Phase I study of high-dose cisplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide.

Authors:  E A Perez; P C Sowray; S L Gardner; D R Gandara
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M J Edelman; S L Khanwani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2001-02

3.  Symptomatic, stage IV, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): response, toxicity, performance status change and symptom relief in patients treated with cisplatin, vinblastine and mitomycin-C.

Authors:  D Tummarello; F Graziano; P Isidori; R Cellerino
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.