Literature DB >> 21761244

Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study.

Peter Williams1, Elizabeth Wager.   

Abstract

Editors have a responsibility to retract seriously flawed articles from their journals. However, there appears to be little consistency in journals' policies or procedures for this. In a qualitative study, we therefore interviewed editors of science journals using semi-structured interviews to investigate their experience of retracting articles. We identified potential barriers to retraction, difficulties in the process and also sources of support and encouragement. Our findings have been used as the basis for guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21761244     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  5 in total

1.  Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?

Authors:  Sara B Nath; Steven C Marcus; Benjamin G Druss
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Déjà vu--a study of duplicate citations in Medline.

Authors:  Mounir Errami; Justin M Hicks; Wayne Fisher; David Trusty; Jonathan D Wren; Tara C Long; Harold R Garner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.

Authors:  Harold C Sox; Drummond Rennie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications.

Authors:  J M Budd; M Sievert; T R Schultz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager; Peter Williams
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.903

  5 in total
  20 in total

1.  Plagiarism Allegations Account for Most Retractions in Major Latin American/Caribbean Databases.

Authors:  Renan Moritz V R Almeida; Karina de Albuquerque Rocha; Fernanda Catelani; Aldo José Fontes-Pereira; Sonia M R Vasconcelos
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Elizabeth Wager; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2015-07

3.  Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error.

Authors:  Mohammad Hosseini; Medard Hilhorst; Inez de Beaufort; Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review.

Authors:  Christian J Wiedermann
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-08-04

6.  Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Judit Dobránszki
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study.

Authors:  Evelyne Decullier; Laure Huot; Géraldine Samson; Hervé Maisonneuve
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-06-19

8.  Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  How should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct?

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15

10.  Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities.

Authors:  Caroline Lievore; Priscila Rubbo; Celso Biynkievycz Dos Santos; Claudia Tânia Picinin; Luiz Alberto Pilatti
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.