Literature DB >> 21761229

Comparison of characteristics and therapeutic efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated by rheumatologists and those treated by orthopedic surgeons under a team medicine approach at the same institute.

Shigeki Momohara1, Eisuke Inoue, Katsunori Ikari, Koichiro Yano, Asami Tokita, Yurino Honjo, Yu Sakuma, Ryo Hiroshima, Takuji Iwamoto, Yohei Seto, Eiichi Tanaka, Atsuo Taniguchi, Hisashi Yamanaka.   

Abstract

The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved dramatically with the advent of the latest generation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Despite these advances, in some patients inflammation is not diminished sufficiently to prevent irreversible musculoskeletal damage, thereby necessitating surgical intervention to reduce pain and improve function. For RA treatment, Japanese orthopedic surgeons also prescribe medication. In this study, we examined whether this Japanese system is effective for RA treatment. We analyzed the clinical condition of RA patients treated by rheumatologists and those treated by orthopedists in a linked registry study using information from a large observational cohort of RA patients followed every half year from 2000 to 2010 (the IORRA cohort). Two groups of patients were compared: patients treated by rheumatologists (rheumatologic group) and patients treated by orthopedists (orthopedic group). The results revealed that patients in the orthopedic group were older, more likely to be female, and had a longer disease duration than patients in the rheumatologic group. The proportion of patients with a history of joint surgery was also much higher in the orthopedic group than in the rheumatologic group. The average scores on the Japanese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and the remission ratio determined using a Boolean-based definition gradually increased from 2000 until 2010, and these findings were consistently better in the rheumatologic group than in the orthopedic group. These data suggest that patients treated primarily by orthopedists are more likely to have long-standing RA compared to patients treated by rheumatologists. Therefore, it is critical for rheumatologists and orthopedists to complement each other medically in the treatment of RA patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21761229     DOI: 10.1007/s10165-011-0495-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Rheumatol        ISSN: 1439-7595            Impact factor:   3.023


  3 in total

1.  [Rheumatology - Integration into student training (RISA) : Current structure of clinical rheumatology in German universities (RISA III)].

Authors:  G Riemekasten; M Aringer; C G O Baerwald; A Meyer-Bahlburg; R Bergner; M Feuchtenberger; C Gebhardt; B Hellmich; G Keyßer; H-M Lorenz; C Kneitz; T Witte; U Müller-Ladner; M Schneider; J Braun; J Rautenstrauch; C Specker; H Schulze-Koops
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Ten-year incidences of self-reported non-vertebral fractures in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: discrepancy between disease activity control and the incidence of non-vertebral fracture.

Authors:  K Ochi; E Inoue; T Furuya; K Ikari; Y Toyama; A Taniguchi; H Yamanaka; S Momohara
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Features of patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose debut joint is a foot or ankle joint: A 5,479-case study from the IORRA cohort.

Authors:  Koichiro Yano; Katsunori Ikari; Eisuke Inoue; Yu Sakuma; Takeshi Mochizuki; Naoko Koenuma; Haruki Tobimatsu; Eiichi Tanaka; Atsuo Taniguchi; Ken Okazaki; Hisashi Yamanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.