Ali Guermazi1, Frank W Roemer, Daichi Hayashi. 1. Quantitative Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA. guermazi@bu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Imaging plays an increasingly important role in the continuing effort to understand the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and in the quest for disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs. To assist investigators in choosing the appropriate imaging technique for a particular goal of a study, this review describes, from a radiological point of view, key studies that were published between May 2010 and May 2011. RECENT FINDINGS: MRI and ultrasound are the two key modalities for osteoarthritis research today. MRI offers semiquantitative, quantitative and compositional assessment. The importance of contrast-enhanced MRI for synovitis assessment has been demonstrated by several studies. Radiography still has a role in clinical trials in light of regulatory requirements, but investigators need to be aware of its inherent limitations. MRI is the best modality for imaging of osteoarthritis: its strengths and unique advantages include ability to visualize multiple individual tissue pathologies relating to pain and also to predict clinical outcome. SUMMARY: MRI enables multitissue morphologic and compositional assessment of the joint. Contrast-enhanced MRI is essential for evaluation of synovitis in knee osteoarthritis. Ultrasound is a useful technique for assessing synovitis and structural damage especially in hand osteoarthritis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Imaging plays an increasingly important role in the continuing effort to understand the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and in the quest for disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs. To assist investigators in choosing the appropriate imaging technique for a particular goal of a study, this review describes, from a radiological point of view, key studies that were published between May 2010 and May 2011. RECENT FINDINGS: MRI and ultrasound are the two key modalities for osteoarthritis research today. MRI offers semiquantitative, quantitative and compositional assessment. The importance of contrast-enhanced MRI for synovitis assessment has been demonstrated by several studies. Radiography still has a role in clinical trials in light of regulatory requirements, but investigators need to be aware of its inherent limitations. MRI is the best modality for imaging of osteoarthritis: its strengths and unique advantages include ability to visualize multiple individual tissue pathologies relating to pain and also to predict clinical outcome. SUMMARY: MRI enables multitissue morphologic and compositional assessment of the joint. Contrast-enhanced MRI is essential for evaluation of synovitis in knee osteoarthritis. Ultrasound is a useful technique for assessing synovitis and structural damage especially in hand osteoarthritis.
Authors: Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Charles Oshinsky; Mukundan Attur; Sisi Ma; Hua Zhou; Fangfei Zheng; Meng Chen; Jyoti Patel; Jonathan Samuels; Virginia C Pike; Ravinder Regatte; Jenny Bencardino; Leon Rybak; Steven Abramson; Michael H Pillinger Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Nima Befrui; Jens Elsner; Achim Flesser; Jacqueline Huvanandana; Oussama Jarrousse; Tuan Nam Le; Marcus Müller; Walther H W Schulze; Stefan Taing; Simon Weidert Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Amanda E Nelson; Emily Elstad; Robert F DeVellis; Todd A Schwartz; Yvonne M Golightly; Jordan B Renner; Philip G Conaghan; Virginia B Kraus; Joanne M Jordan Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Ali Guermazi; Jingbo Niu; Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; Martin Englund; Tuhina Neogi; Piran Aliabadi; Christine E McLennan; David T Felson Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-08-29
Authors: Jesper Knoop; Joost Dekker; Jan-Paul Klein; Marike van der Leeden; Martin van der Esch; Dick Reiding; Ramon E Voorneman; Martijn Gerritsen; Leo D Roorda; Martijn P M Steultjens; Willem F Lems Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 5.156