BACKGROUND: Determination of HER2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and genomic status by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) are important in identifying a subset of high HER2-expressing gastric cancers that might respond to trastuzumab. Although FISH is considered the standard for determination of HER2 genomic status, brightfield ISH is being increasingly recognised as a viable alternative. Also, the impact of HER2 protein expression/genomic heterogeneity on the accuracy of HER2 testing has not been well studied in the context of gastric biopsy samples. AIMS/ METHODS: To study the utility of brightfield ISH in the evaluation of HER2 genomic status, the correlation coefficient between dual-colour HER2/Chromosome 17 chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) and FISH was ascertained. To study the impact of intratumoral heterogeneity on the accuracy of HER2 testing, the concordance rate of HER2 protein expression/genomic status between matched biopsies and surgical resection specimens of high HER2-expressing gastric cancers was ascertained. RESULTS: The dual-colour CISH assay showed a 100% concordance rate with FISH results in 119 samples (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.987, p<0.001). Five of the 11 high-HER2 expressors (defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/FISH-amplified according to Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer trial criteria) showed an IHC 3+ score on matched biopsies (concordance rate 45.5%). Nine of these 11 cases showed HER2 amplification on matched biopsies (concordance rate 81.8%). CONCLUSION: Dual-colour CISH is an excellent alternative for the evaluation of HER2 genomic status in gastric cancers. Determination of HER2 status by HER2 IHC alone in limited gastric biopsy samples results in a high false-negative rate, and diagnostic accuracy appears to be improved if HER2 genomic testing, either alone or concurrently with IHC, is performed for HER2 testing.
BACKGROUND: Determination of HER2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and genomic status by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) are important in identifying a subset of high HER2-expressing gastric cancers that might respond to trastuzumab. Although FISH is considered the standard for determination of HER2 genomic status, brightfield ISH is being increasingly recognised as a viable alternative. Also, the impact of HER2 protein expression/genomic heterogeneity on the accuracy of HER2 testing has not been well studied in the context of gastric biopsy samples. AIMS/ METHODS: To study the utility of brightfield ISH in the evaluation of HER2 genomic status, the correlation coefficient between dual-colour HER2/Chromosome 17 chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) and FISH was ascertained. To study the impact of intratumoral heterogeneity on the accuracy of HER2 testing, the concordance rate of HER2 protein expression/genomic status between matched biopsies and surgical resection specimens of high HER2-expressing gastric cancers was ascertained. RESULTS: The dual-colour CISH assay showed a 100% concordance rate with FISH results in 119 samples (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.987, p<0.001). Five of the 11 high-HER2 expressors (defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/FISH-amplified according to Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer trial criteria) showed an IHC 3+ score on matched biopsies (concordance rate 45.5%). Nine of these 11 cases showed HER2 amplification on matched biopsies (concordance rate 81.8%). CONCLUSION: Dual-colour CISH is an excellent alternative for the evaluation of HER2 genomic status in gastric cancers. Determination of HER2 status by HER2 IHC alone in limited gastric biopsy samples results in a high false-negative rate, and diagnostic accuracy appears to be improved if HER2 genomic testing, either alone or concurrently with IHC, is performed for HER2 testing.
Authors: Angela N Bartley; Mary Kay Washington; Christina B Ventura; Nofisat Ismaila; Carol Colasacco; Al B Benson; Alfredo Carrato; Margaret L Gulley; Dhanpat Jain; Sanjay Kakar; Helen J Mackay; Catherine Streutker; Laura Tang; Megan Troxell; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Julian C Schink; Julia R Trosman; Christine B Weldon; Kalliopi P Siziopikou; Gregory J Tsongalis; Alfred W Rademaker; Jyoti D Patel; Al B Benson; Edith A Perez; William J Gradishar Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Carlos Gómez-Martin; Elena Garralda; M José Echarri; Anabel Ballesteros; Alberto Arcediano; José Luis Rodríguez-Peralto; Manuel Hidalgo; Fernando López-Ríos Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 3.411