Literature DB >> 21757118

Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome.

Sebastian Herrmann1, Stefan Störk, Markus Niemann, Volkmar Lange, Jörg M Strotmann, Stefan Frantz, Meinrad Beer, Stefan Gattenlöhner, Wolfram Voelker, Georg Ertl, Frank Weidemann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This prospective cohort study in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) aimed to identify surrogates of myocardial fibrosis that are easy to derive in clinical practice, allow the differentiation of low-gradient severe AS from moderate AS, and have an impact on clinical outcome.
BACKGROUND: In patients with symptomatic aortic AS, a characteristic subgroup (i.e., up to one-third) exhibits severe AS with a concomitant low mean valve gradient either with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (EF). It is hypothesized that these patients tend to have an advanced stage of myocardial fibrosis and poor clinical outcome.
METHODS: Eighty-six patients with moderate or severe AS were examined by echocardiography including conventional aortic valve assessment, mitral ring displacement, and strain-rate imaging. Replacement fibrosis was quantified by late-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Biopsy samples were taken from patients with severe AS (n = 69) at aortic valve replacement. All patients were followed for 9 months.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into 4 groups according to aortic valve area (<1.0 cm(2)), mean valve gradient ≥40 mm Hg, and EF (<50%): group 1, moderate AS (n = 17); group 2, severe AS/high gradient (n = 49); group 3, severe AS/low gradient/preserved EF (n = 11); and group 4, severe AS/low gradient/decreased EF (n = 9). At baseline, a significant decrease in mitral ring displacement and systolic strain rate was detected in patients with low-gradient AS. In low-gradient groups, a higher degree of interstitial fibrosis in biopsy samples and more late-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging segments were observed. A close inverse correlation was found between interstitial fibrosis and mitral ring displacement (r = -0.79, p < 0.0001). Clinical outcome was best for patients in group 1, whereas mortality risk increased substantially in groups 2 through 4.
CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS, a low gradient is associated with a higher degree of fibrosis, decreased longitudinal function, and poorer clinical outcome despite preserved EF. Mitral ring displacement differentiates between moderate AS and low-gradient/severe AS with preserved EF.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21757118     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  67 in total

Review 1.  Pressure Volume System for Management of Heart Failure and Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Frederick G P Welt; James C Fang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Grading aortic stenosis severity when the flow modifies the gradientvalve area correlation.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Low gradient "severe" aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Alper Ozkan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03

4.  Low-flow aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Kou Seisyou
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-12-17

Review 5.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

Review 6.  The most important publications of the past year in echocardiography.

Authors:  A Farkhooy; F A Flachskampf
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in TAVR Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Balaji Tamarappoo; Donghee Han; Jeffrey Tyler; Tarun Chakravarty; Yuka Otaki; Robert Miller; Evann Eisenberg; Siddharth Singh; Takahiro Shiota; Robert Siegel; Jasminka Stegic; Tracy Salseth; Wen Cheng; Damini Dey; Louise Thomson; Daniel Berman; John Friedman; Raj Makkar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28

8.  Interference with ERK(Thr188) phosphorylation impairs pathological but not physiological cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  Catharina Ruppert; Katharina Deiss; Sebastian Herrmann; Marie Vidal; Mehmet Oezkur; Armin Gorski; Frank Weidemann; Martin J Lohse; Kristina Lorenz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Impact of Ejection Fraction and Aortic Valve Gradient on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Suzanne J Baron; Suzanne V Arnold; Howard C Herrmann; David R Holmes; Wilson Y Szeto; Keith B Allen; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; Sreekaanth Vemulapali; Sean O'Brien; Dadi Dai; David J Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.